‘Doing’ digital transformation: theorising the practitioner voice

IF 2.8 Q2 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE Journal of Decision Systems Pub Date : 2022-05-16 DOI:10.1080/12460125.2022.2074650
Patrick McCarthy, David Sammon, Ibrahim Alhassan
{"title":"‘Doing’ digital transformation: theorising the practitioner voice","authors":"Patrick McCarthy, David Sammon, Ibrahim Alhassan","doi":"10.1080/12460125.2022.2074650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The objective of this theory-building research is to explore the defining characteristics of ‘doing’ Digital Transformation (DT) and present a holistic account of the practitioner practices that characterise ‘doing’ DT. For the purposes of this research ‘doing’ DT is defined as leveraging digital technologies to significantly alter an organisational design in order to enhance customer engagement. To fulfil this objective, we select 16 key informants (digital transformation leaders) based on their organisational perspective (Business or IT) and role (Strategic or Operational), which facilitates hearing 4 types of practitioner voices. Following an inductive open coding approach, 348 excerpts were coded, leading to the emergence of 95 concepts, which were further grouped into 14 categories. In this paper, we focus our write-up on the six most frequently occurring categories that are shaped by all four key informant groups (practitioner voices). This paper is unique in providing a holistic categorisation of the defining characteristics of ‘doing’ DT, while also providing 24 ‘Practitioner Priorities’. These ‘Practitioner Priorities’ sharpens the focus of academia and practice, highlighting the ‘role of people’, ‘role of data’ and ‘role of technology’ when ‘doing’ DT.","PeriodicalId":45565,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Decision Systems","volume":"31 1","pages":"341 - 361"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Decision Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2022.2074650","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT The objective of this theory-building research is to explore the defining characteristics of ‘doing’ Digital Transformation (DT) and present a holistic account of the practitioner practices that characterise ‘doing’ DT. For the purposes of this research ‘doing’ DT is defined as leveraging digital technologies to significantly alter an organisational design in order to enhance customer engagement. To fulfil this objective, we select 16 key informants (digital transformation leaders) based on their organisational perspective (Business or IT) and role (Strategic or Operational), which facilitates hearing 4 types of practitioner voices. Following an inductive open coding approach, 348 excerpts were coded, leading to the emergence of 95 concepts, which were further grouped into 14 categories. In this paper, we focus our write-up on the six most frequently occurring categories that are shaped by all four key informant groups (practitioner voices). This paper is unique in providing a holistic categorisation of the defining characteristics of ‘doing’ DT, while also providing 24 ‘Practitioner Priorities’. These ‘Practitioner Priorities’ sharpens the focus of academia and practice, highlighting the ‘role of people’, ‘role of data’ and ‘role of technology’ when ‘doing’ DT.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“做”数字化转型:理论化从业者的声音
摘要本理论构建研究的目的是探索“做”数字化转型(DT)的定义特征,并对“做”DT的从业者实践进行全面描述。为了本研究的目的,“做”DT被定义为利用数字技术显著改变组织设计,以提高客户参与度。为了实现这一目标,我们根据组织视角(业务或IT)和角色(战略或运营)选择了16名关键信息员(数字化转型领导者),这有助于听到4种从业者的声音。按照归纳开放编码方法,对348个摘录进行了编码,从而产生了95个概念,这些概念被进一步分为14类。在本文中,我们将重点关注由所有四个关键信息群体(从业者声音)形成的六个最常见的类别。本文独特地对“做”DT的定义特征进行了全面分类,同时还提供了24个“从业者优先事项”。这些“从业者优先事项”强化了学术界和实践界的关注点,突出了“做”DT时“人的作用”、“数据的作用”和“技术的作用”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Decision Systems
Journal of Decision Systems OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
23.50%
发文量
55
期刊最新文献
Public acceptance of smart home technologies in the UK: a citizens’ jury study Perceptions of facilitators towards adoption of AI-based solutions for sustainable agriculture I am therefore, I do: a fit perspective of decision-making styles and business intelligence usage AI: A knowledge sharing tool for improving employees’ performance Data-driven decision making in advanced manufacturing Systems: modeling and analysis of critical success factors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1