Why Evaluation of Leadership Coaching Counts

IF 0.9 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching & Mentoring Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.24384/PRB0-S320
M. Jamieson, T. Wall, N. Moore
{"title":"Why Evaluation of Leadership Coaching Counts","authors":"M. Jamieson, T. Wall, N. Moore","doi":"10.24384/PRB0-S320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evidence suggests organisations’ significant investment in leadership coaching is characterised by two evaluation paradoxes: despite high strategic expectations and substantial budgets, evaluation has low strategic status; and, where organisations do attempt to evaluate, focus contradicts espoused overarching leadership outcomes. In response to criticism that research methodologies fail to replicate complex leadership environments, this study adopts ambidexterity to produce new moderators to explore the contradictory environment for evaluation and potential for a wider strategic contribution.","PeriodicalId":44889,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching & Mentoring","volume":"1 1","pages":"3-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching & Mentoring","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24384/PRB0-S320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Evidence suggests organisations’ significant investment in leadership coaching is characterised by two evaluation paradoxes: despite high strategic expectations and substantial budgets, evaluation has low strategic status; and, where organisations do attempt to evaluate, focus contradicts espoused overarching leadership outcomes. In response to criticism that research methodologies fail to replicate complex leadership environments, this study adopts ambidexterity to produce new moderators to explore the contradictory environment for evaluation and potential for a wider strategic contribution.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么领导力培训评估很重要
有证据表明,组织在领导力辅导方面的重大投资有两个评价悖论:尽管有很高的战略期望和大量预算,但评价的战略地位很低;而且,当组织确实试图进行评估时,关注点与所支持的总体领导成果相矛盾。针对研究方法未能复制复杂领导环境的批评,本研究采用了双重灵活性来产生新的调节者,以探索相互矛盾的评估环境和更广泛的战略贡献潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
42.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
How have workplace coaches experienced coaching during the Covid-19 pandemic? A Parallel Journey: The varied roles of coaching in an elite athlete's transition to a second career The role of courage in the development and practice of coaches Understanding the coaching experiences of non-traditional students in Higher Education in the UK A Qualitative Evaluation of SMU’s Peer Helpers Programme
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1