Toward a Decolonial Feminist Imaginary: Decolonizing Futurity

IF 1.3 Q2 ETHNIC STUDIES Critical Philosophy of Race Pub Date : 2020-02-05 DOI:10.5325/critphilrace.8.1-2.0237

E. Mendieta

引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract:This article takes up the work of Bottici, Cornell, and Perez in order to expand on Lugones's inchoate notion of a decolonial feminist imaginary. The claim is that decolonial feminism is also the elaboration of a decolonial feminist imaginary that challenges the colonial/modern imaginary of global capitalism. The article also takes up Lugones's critique of Mignolo's notion of "colonial difference," which is found to be incoherent and even dangerous.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

走向非殖民化的女权主义想象:非殖民化的未来

摘要：本文采用了Bottici、Cornell和Perez的作品，以扩展Lugones关于非殖民化女权主义想象的早期概念。这种说法是，非殖民化女权主义也是对非殖民化女权想象的阐述，它挑战了全球资本主义的殖民/现代想象。这篇文章还谈到了卢戈内斯对Mignolo的“殖民差异”概念的批评，这一概念被认为是不连贯的，甚至是危险的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Critical Philosophy of Race ETHNIC STUDIES-

CiteScore

2.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The critical philosophy of race consists in the philosophical examination of issues raised by the concept of race, the practices and mechanisms of racialization, and the persistence of various forms of racism across the world. Critical philosophy of race is a critical enterprise in three respects: it opposes racism in all its forms; it rejects the pseudosciences of old-fashioned biological racialism; and it denies that anti-racism and anti-racialism summarily eliminate race as a meaningful category of analysis. Critical philosophy of race is a philosophical enterprise because of its engagement with traditional philosophical questions and in its readiness to engage critically some of the traditional answers.

期刊最新文献

Being Black and Woman in a Racist and Sexist Society: Locating an Existential Standpoint Philosophy in Mamphela Ramphele’s Autobiography Race, Intellectual Racism, and the Opened Door Rodney, Mills, and Rousseau: Revisiting the Social Contract Idea “Why Race Still Matters” Can Iqaba Possess Ontological Legitimacy?