Does Feminization Always Lead to Declines in Earnings? Evidence from China’s Marketization (1988 to 2013)

IF 1.2 4区 社会学 Q3 SOCIOLOGY Sociological Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-07-05 DOI:10.1080/00380253.2023.2228366
Meiying Li
{"title":"Does Feminization Always Lead to Declines in Earnings? Evidence from China’s Marketization (1988 to 2013)","authors":"Meiying Li","doi":"10.1080/00380253.2023.2228366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT One explanation of increasing gender earnings inequality during China’s marketization is the increasing representation of women in industries and occupations in which, on average, earnings are declining. I argue that focusing on the average relationship between feminization and earnings is insufficient to understand complex changes in gender inequality during this period. I hypothesize that the feminization-earnings relationship may vary by industry because of differences in devaluation, social closure, and earnings-setting mechanisms. The hypotheses are tested using data from the China Household Income Project (1988– 2013) in industry-province level fixed-effects models. Results support the hypotheses that focus on industry-specific contexts. Specifically, feminization is not negatively associated with earnings in state-monopolized industries, where earnings are protected, and finance-insurance industries, where high-skilled female-typed skills have been increasingly in demand. I discuss implications for understanding segregation amongst the highly educated.","PeriodicalId":48007,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Quarterly","volume":"64 1","pages":"676 - 701"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2023.2228366","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT One explanation of increasing gender earnings inequality during China’s marketization is the increasing representation of women in industries and occupations in which, on average, earnings are declining. I argue that focusing on the average relationship between feminization and earnings is insufficient to understand complex changes in gender inequality during this period. I hypothesize that the feminization-earnings relationship may vary by industry because of differences in devaluation, social closure, and earnings-setting mechanisms. The hypotheses are tested using data from the China Household Income Project (1988– 2013) in industry-province level fixed-effects models. Results support the hypotheses that focus on industry-specific contexts. Specifically, feminization is not negatively associated with earnings in state-monopolized industries, where earnings are protected, and finance-insurance industries, where high-skilled female-typed skills have been increasingly in demand. I discuss implications for understanding segregation amongst the highly educated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
女性化总是导致收入下降吗?来自中国市场化的证据(1988 - 2013)
摘要中国市场化过程中性别收入不平等加剧的一种解释是,女性在平均收入下降的行业和职业中的代表性不断增加。我认为,关注女性化与收入之间的平均关系不足以理解这一时期性别不平等的复杂变化。我假设,由于贬值、社会封闭和收入设定机制的差异,女性化与收入的关系可能因行业而异。这些假设是使用中国家庭收入项目(1988-2013)的数据在工业-省级固定效应模型中进行检验的。研究结果支持了专注于特定行业背景的假设。具体而言,在收入受到保护的国家垄断行业和金融保险行业,女性化与收入没有负面关系,在这些行业,对女性高技能技能的需求越来越大。我讨论了理解高学历人群中种族隔离的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: The Sociological Quarterly is devoted to publishing cutting-edge research and theory in all areas of sociological inquiry. Our focus is on publishing the best in empirical research and sociological theory. We look for articles that advance the discipline and reach the widest possible audience. Since 1960, the contributors and readers of The Sociological Quarterly have made it one of the leading generalist journals in the field. Each issue is designed for efficient browsing and reading and the articles are helpful for teaching and classroom use.
期刊最新文献
Unconventional Work, Conventional Problems: Gig Microtask Work, Inequality, and the Flexibility Mystique Mooring Christian Nationalism: How Religious Institutions, Participation, and Beliefs Inform Christian Nationalism Labor Market Inequality, Debt, and the Consequences of Sub-Baccalaureate Higher Education How Local Perceptions Contribute to Urban Environmental Activism: Evidence from the Chicago Metropolitan Area Sad Puppies and SJWs: Symbolic Revolution and Challenges to Field Orthodoxy in the Struggle for Control of Science Fiction’s Hugo Awards
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1