A systematic review of telemedicine systems use barriers: primary health care providers' perspective

Reihaneh Alsadat Tabaeeian, Behzad Hajrahimi, Atefeh Khoshfetrat
{"title":"A systematic review of telemedicine systems use barriers: primary health care providers' perspective","authors":"Reihaneh Alsadat Tabaeeian, Behzad Hajrahimi, Atefeh Khoshfetrat","doi":"10.1108/jstpm-07-2021-0106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this review paper was identifying barriers to the use of telemedicine systems in primary health-care individual level among professionals.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study used Scopus and PubMed databases for scientific records identification. A systematic review of the literature structured by PRISMA guidelines was conducted on 37 included papers published between 2009 and 2019. A qualitative approach was used to synthesize insights into using telemedicine by primary care professionals.\n\n\nFindings\nThree barriers were identified and classified: system quality, data quality and service quality barriers. System complexity in terms of usability, system unreliability, security and privacy concerns, lack of integration and inflexibility of systems-in-use are related to system quality. Data quality barriers are data inaccuracy, data timeliness issues, data conciseness concerns and lack of data uniqueness. Finally, service reliability concerns, lack of technical support and lack of user training have been categorized as service quality barriers.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis review identified and mapped emerging themes of barriers to the use of telemedicine systems. This paper also through a new conceptualization of telemedicine use from perspectives of the primary care professionals contributes to informatics literature and system usage practices.\n","PeriodicalId":45751,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jstpm-07-2021-0106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this review paper was identifying barriers to the use of telemedicine systems in primary health-care individual level among professionals. Design/methodology/approach This study used Scopus and PubMed databases for scientific records identification. A systematic review of the literature structured by PRISMA guidelines was conducted on 37 included papers published between 2009 and 2019. A qualitative approach was used to synthesize insights into using telemedicine by primary care professionals. Findings Three barriers were identified and classified: system quality, data quality and service quality barriers. System complexity in terms of usability, system unreliability, security and privacy concerns, lack of integration and inflexibility of systems-in-use are related to system quality. Data quality barriers are data inaccuracy, data timeliness issues, data conciseness concerns and lack of data uniqueness. Finally, service reliability concerns, lack of technical support and lack of user training have been categorized as service quality barriers. Originality/value This review identified and mapped emerging themes of barriers to the use of telemedicine systems. This paper also through a new conceptualization of telemedicine use from perspectives of the primary care professionals contributes to informatics literature and system usage practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
远程医疗系统使用障碍的系统回顾:初级卫生保健提供者的观点
目的:本综述的目的是确定专业人员在初级卫生保健个人层面使用远程医疗系统的障碍。设计/方法/方法本研究使用Scopus和PubMed数据库进行科学记录鉴定。对2009年至2019年期间发表的37篇纳入的PRISMA指南的文献进行了系统综述。一种定性的方法被用来综合见解使用远程医疗的初级保健专业人员。发现识别并分类了三个障碍:系统质量、数据质量和服务质量障碍。在可用性、系统不可靠性、安全性和隐私性方面的系统复杂性、使用中的系统缺乏集成和缺乏灵活性都与系统质量有关。数据质量障碍包括数据不准确、数据及时性问题、数据简洁性问题和缺乏数据唯一性。最后,服务可靠性问题、缺乏技术支持和缺乏用户培训被归类为服务质量障碍。原创性/价值本综述确定并绘制了远程医疗系统使用障碍的新主题。本文还从初级保健专业人员的角度对远程医疗的使用进行了新的概念化,为信息学文献和系统使用实践做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
57
期刊最新文献
Editorial: “Digital transformation, innovation and competitiveness: some insights from Asia” Mathematical optimization of the sustainable gasoline supply chain: systematic literature review Exploring prospects of blockchain and fintech: using SLR approach Factors affecting the adoption of mobile payment services during the COVID-19 pandemic: an application of extended UTAUT2 model Developing entrepreneurship skills in scientific academia: best practices from India and Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1