Transmitting white monolingual Anglo-American norms: A concept analysis of “quality of language” in parent-child interactions

IF 2.4 2区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS Applied Psycholinguistics Pub Date : 2023-03-06 DOI:10.1017/S014271642300005X
A. Macleod, Catrine Demers
{"title":"Transmitting white monolingual Anglo-American norms: A concept analysis of “quality of language” in parent-child interactions","authors":"A. Macleod, Catrine Demers","doi":"10.1017/S014271642300005X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract White monolingual Anglo-American values permeate language acquisition research, which extends into public health and educational policies. “Quality of language” in parent-child interactions is often called upon to explain weaknesses in the language development of children who are racialized, experiencing poverty, or bilingual. Indeed, many early intervention approaches build on this premise by aiming to improve the “quality of language” used by parents. We aimed to understand the conceptualizations of “quality of language” in studies of parent-child interaction through the critical lens of Community Cultural Wealth Theory and perspectives from development research across cultures. We completed a Systematic Concept Analysis of articles published from 2010 to 2022 and focused on parent-child interactions in the home environment. Our search identified 972 articles and 78 met the inclusion criteria, but only 45 papers provided a definition. These definitions covered eight conceptualizations but only three were previously described. We also found inequity in the use of this terminology, which focused on children who were bilingual, had disability, or experiencing poverty. Informed by a critical lens, we recommend the use of four new terms to encompass “quality of language.” We also recommend refraining from using this term as it is value-laden, poorly defined, and diminishes culturally sustaining language transmission practices.","PeriodicalId":48065,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psycholinguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Psycholinguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271642300005X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract White monolingual Anglo-American values permeate language acquisition research, which extends into public health and educational policies. “Quality of language” in parent-child interactions is often called upon to explain weaknesses in the language development of children who are racialized, experiencing poverty, or bilingual. Indeed, many early intervention approaches build on this premise by aiming to improve the “quality of language” used by parents. We aimed to understand the conceptualizations of “quality of language” in studies of parent-child interaction through the critical lens of Community Cultural Wealth Theory and perspectives from development research across cultures. We completed a Systematic Concept Analysis of articles published from 2010 to 2022 and focused on parent-child interactions in the home environment. Our search identified 972 articles and 78 met the inclusion criteria, but only 45 papers provided a definition. These definitions covered eight conceptualizations but only three were previously described. We also found inequity in the use of this terminology, which focused on children who were bilingual, had disability, or experiencing poverty. Informed by a critical lens, we recommend the use of four new terms to encompass “quality of language.” We also recommend refraining from using this term as it is value-laden, poorly defined, and diminishes culturally sustaining language transmission practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
传递白人单语英美规范:亲子互动中“语言质量”的概念分析
摘要白人的单一语言英美价值观渗透到语言习得研究中,并延伸到公共卫生和教育政策中。亲子互动中的“语言质量”通常被用来解释种族化、贫困或双语儿童在语言发展方面的弱点。事实上,许多早期干预方法都建立在这一前提下,旨在提高父母使用的“语言质量”。我们旨在通过社区文化财富理论的批判性视角和跨文化发展研究的视角,理解亲子互动研究中“语言质量”的概念。我们完成了对2010年至2022年发表的文章的系统概念分析,重点关注家庭环境中的亲子互动。我们的搜索确定了972篇文章,78篇符合纳入标准,但只有45篇论文提供了定义。这些定义涵盖了八个概念,但之前只描述了三个。我们还发现,在使用这一术语时存在不公平现象,该术语侧重于双语、残疾或经历贫困的儿童。从批判性的角度来看,我们建议使用四个新术语来涵盖“语言质量”。我们还建议不要使用这个术语,因为它充满了价值,定义不清,并减少了文化上可持续的语言传播实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Applied Psycholinguistics publishes original research papers on the psychological processes involved in language. It examines language development , language use and language disorders in adults and children with a particular emphasis on cross-language studies. The journal gathers together the best work from a variety of disciplines including linguistics, psychology, reading, education, language learning, speech and hearing, and neurology. In addition to research reports, theoretical reviews will be considered for publication as will keynote articles and commentaries.
期刊最新文献
Does perceptual high variability phonetic training improve L2 speech production? A meta-analysis of perception-production connection You might want to tone down your advice: An experimental investigation of the speech act of advice in French The psycholinguistics of shining-through effects in translation: cross-linguistic structural priming or serial lexical co-activation? What contributes to fluent L2 speech? Examining cognitive and utterance fluency link with underlying L2 collocational processing speed and accuracy Language anxiety does not affect the growth of L2 reading achievement: The latent growth curve model approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1