ChatGPT: Friend or foe in medical writing? An example of how ChatGPT can be utilized in writing case reports

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY Surgery in practice and science Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.sipas.2023.100185
Wai Lone Jonathan Ho , Bilal Koussayer , Joseph Sujka
{"title":"ChatGPT: Friend or foe in medical writing? An example of how ChatGPT can be utilized in writing case reports","authors":"Wai Lone Jonathan Ho ,&nbsp;Bilal Koussayer ,&nbsp;Joseph Sujka","doi":"10.1016/j.sipas.2023.100185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>ChatGPT is a chatbot built on a natural language processing model which can generate human-like responses to prompts given to it. Despite its lack of domain-specific training, ChatGPT has developed remarkable accuracy in interpreting clinical information. In this article, we aim to assess what role ChatGPT can serve in medical writing. We recruited a first-year medical student with no prior experience in writing case reports to write a case report on a complex surgery with the assistance of ChatGPT. After a thorough evaluation of its responses, we believe that ChatGPT is a powerful medical writing tool that can be used to generate summaries, proofread, and provide valuable medical insight. However, ChatGPT is not a substitute for a study author due to several significant limitations, and should instead be used in conjunction with the author during the writing process. As the impact of natural language processing models such as ChatGPT grows, we suggest that guidelines be established on how to better utilize this technology to improve clinical research rather than outright prohibiting its usage.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74890,"journal":{"name":"Surgery in practice and science","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100185"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery in practice and science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262023000311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ChatGPT is a chatbot built on a natural language processing model which can generate human-like responses to prompts given to it. Despite its lack of domain-specific training, ChatGPT has developed remarkable accuracy in interpreting clinical information. In this article, we aim to assess what role ChatGPT can serve in medical writing. We recruited a first-year medical student with no prior experience in writing case reports to write a case report on a complex surgery with the assistance of ChatGPT. After a thorough evaluation of its responses, we believe that ChatGPT is a powerful medical writing tool that can be used to generate summaries, proofread, and provide valuable medical insight. However, ChatGPT is not a substitute for a study author due to several significant limitations, and should instead be used in conjunction with the author during the writing process. As the impact of natural language processing models such as ChatGPT grows, we suggest that guidelines be established on how to better utilize this technology to improve clinical research rather than outright prohibiting its usage.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CHATGPT:医学写作中的朋友还是敌人?如何利用CHATGPT编写案例报告的示例
ChatGPT是一个建立在自然语言处理模型上的聊天机器人,它可以对给定的提示产生类似人类的反应。尽管缺乏特定领域的训练,ChatGPT在解释临床信息方面已经取得了显著的准确性。在本文中,我们旨在评估ChatGPT在医学写作中的作用。我们招募了一名没有撰写病例报告经验的一年级医学生,在ChatGPT的帮助下撰写了一篇复杂手术的病例报告。在对其回复进行全面评估后,我们认为ChatGPT是一款功能强大的医学写作工具,可用于生成摘要、校对并提供有价值的医学见解。然而,由于几个明显的限制,ChatGPT不能代替研究作者,而是应该在写作过程中与作者一起使用。随着自然语言处理模型(如ChatGPT)的影响越来越大,我们建议建立关于如何更好地利用这项技术来改善临床研究的指导方针,而不是直接禁止它的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
38 days
期刊最新文献
Emergency laparotomy preoperative risk assessment tool performance: A systematic review Letter to the Editor on “The pulmonary contusion score: Development of asimple scoring system for blunt lung injury” Prevalence and associated factors of acute postoperative pain in adult surgical patients: A prospective study Advances and results in omental patch repair of gastrointestinal perforations: A narrative review Practical evaluation of risk factors in patients with osteoporosis-induced thoracic and lumbar vertebral compression fractures requiring surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1