Investigating the Effects of Task Type and Linguistic Background on Accuracy in Automated Speech Recognition Systems: Implications for Use in Language Assessment of Young Learners

IF 1.4 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Language Assessment Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-03-27 DOI:10.1080/15434303.2022.2038172
L. Hannah, H. Kim, E. Jang
{"title":"Investigating the Effects of Task Type and Linguistic Background on Accuracy in Automated Speech Recognition Systems: Implications for Use in Language Assessment of Young Learners","authors":"L. Hannah, H. Kim, E. Jang","doi":"10.1080/15434303.2022.2038172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT As a branch of artificial intelligence, automated speech recognition (ASR) technology is increasingly used to detect speech, process it to text, and derive the meaning of natural language for various learning and assessment purposes. ASR inaccuracy may pose serious threats to valid score interpretations and fair score use for all when it is exacerbated by test takers’ characteristics, such as language background and accent, and assessment task type. The present study investigated the extent to which speech-to-text accuracy rates of three major ASR systems vary across different oral tasks and students’ language background variables. Results indicate that task types and students’ language backgrounds have statistically significant main and interaction effects on ASR accuracy. The paper discusses the implications of the study results for applying ASR to computerized assessment design and automated scoring.","PeriodicalId":46873,"journal":{"name":"Language Assessment Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Assessment Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2022.2038172","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT As a branch of artificial intelligence, automated speech recognition (ASR) technology is increasingly used to detect speech, process it to text, and derive the meaning of natural language for various learning and assessment purposes. ASR inaccuracy may pose serious threats to valid score interpretations and fair score use for all when it is exacerbated by test takers’ characteristics, such as language background and accent, and assessment task type. The present study investigated the extent to which speech-to-text accuracy rates of three major ASR systems vary across different oral tasks and students’ language background variables. Results indicate that task types and students’ language backgrounds have statistically significant main and interaction effects on ASR accuracy. The paper discusses the implications of the study results for applying ASR to computerized assessment design and automated scoring.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究任务类型和语言背景对自动语音识别系统准确性的影响:对年轻学习者语言评估的启示
摘要作为人工智能的一个分支,自动语音识别(ASR)技术越来越多地被用于检测语音、将其处理为文本,并推导自然语言的含义,用于各种学习和评估目的。当考生的特点(如语言背景和口音)以及评估任务类型加剧ASR不准确时,ASR不准确可能会对所有人的有效分数解释和公平分数使用构成严重威胁。本研究调查了三个主要ASR系统在不同口语任务和学生语言背景变量中的语音-文本准确率差异程度。结果表明,任务类型和学生的语言背景对ASR准确性有统计学显著的主要影响和交互影响。本文讨论了研究结果对将ASR应用于计算机化评估设计和自动评分的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Argument-Based Validation in Testing and Assessment The Diagnosis of Writing in a Second or Foreign Language The Role of Gazing Behaviors in Navigating Paired Role-Play Interactional Competence Assessment Tasks Twenty Years of Language Assessment Quarterly: An Interview with LAQ Founder Antony Kunnan Fundamental Considerations in Technology Mediated Language Assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1