Differential advantages of musical backgrounds on binaural integration and interaction skills in instrumentalists, vocalists, and non-musicians

IF 1.4 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Journal of Otology Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.joto.2023.06.003
Kavassery Venkateswaran Nisha, Adya Parmar, Chandana Shivaiah, Prashanth Prabhu
{"title":"Differential advantages of musical backgrounds on binaural integration and interaction skills in instrumentalists, vocalists, and non-musicians","authors":"Kavassery Venkateswaran Nisha,&nbsp;Adya Parmar,&nbsp;Chandana Shivaiah,&nbsp;Prashanth Prabhu","doi":"10.1016/j.joto.2023.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Musical perception requires a host of skills. Instrumental musicians place greater emphasis on motor coordination, whereas vocal musicians rehearse vocal sounds. The study explored the differential advantages of musical background on binaural integration and interaction in musicians (instrumentalists, vocalists) and compared them with age-matched non-musicians.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Eight six participants aged 20–40 y with normal hearing sensitivity were subjected to binaural tests using a standard group comparison research design. The participants were segregated into three groups – Group 1 included instrumentalists (n = 26, mean age: 17.73 ± 2.83 y), while Group 2 and Group 3 consisted of vocalists (n = 30, mean age: 19.30 ± 2.47 y) and non-musicians (n = 30, mean age: 18.20 ± 3.02 y) respectively. The binaural processes namely integration (Dichotic syllable test, DST; and virtual acoustic space identification - VASI) and interaction (Interaural difference thresholds for time and level: ITD &amp; ILD), were administered on all the participants.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Statistical analyses showed the main effect of musicianship. Bonferroni pair-wise test revealed that the musicians (instrumentalists and vocalists) outperformed (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05) non-musicians in all the tests. The differential advantage of the musical background was seen on the binaural integration test with instrumentalists performing better in the VASI test compared to vocalists, and vice-versa for DST. No difference was observed in interaction tasks (ITD &amp; ILD) between vocalists and instrumentalists (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Musical background-induced differential advantages can be reasonably noted in the binaural skills of instrumentalists and vocalists (compared to non-musicians).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37466,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Otology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Otology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1672293023000375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Musical perception requires a host of skills. Instrumental musicians place greater emphasis on motor coordination, whereas vocal musicians rehearse vocal sounds. The study explored the differential advantages of musical background on binaural integration and interaction in musicians (instrumentalists, vocalists) and compared them with age-matched non-musicians.

Methods

Eight six participants aged 20–40 y with normal hearing sensitivity were subjected to binaural tests using a standard group comparison research design. The participants were segregated into three groups – Group 1 included instrumentalists (n = 26, mean age: 17.73 ± 2.83 y), while Group 2 and Group 3 consisted of vocalists (n = 30, mean age: 19.30 ± 2.47 y) and non-musicians (n = 30, mean age: 18.20 ± 3.02 y) respectively. The binaural processes namely integration (Dichotic syllable test, DST; and virtual acoustic space identification - VASI) and interaction (Interaural difference thresholds for time and level: ITD & ILD), were administered on all the participants.

Results

Statistical analyses showed the main effect of musicianship. Bonferroni pair-wise test revealed that the musicians (instrumentalists and vocalists) outperformed (p < 0.05) non-musicians in all the tests. The differential advantage of the musical background was seen on the binaural integration test with instrumentalists performing better in the VASI test compared to vocalists, and vice-versa for DST. No difference was observed in interaction tasks (ITD & ILD) between vocalists and instrumentalists (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Musical background-induced differential advantages can be reasonably noted in the binaural skills of instrumentalists and vocalists (compared to non-musicians).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
音乐背景对器乐演奏家、声乐家和非音乐家双耳融合和互动技能的差异优势
音乐感知需要很多技巧。器乐音乐家更强调运动协调,而声乐音乐家则排练声乐。本研究探讨了音乐背景对音乐家(器乐演奏家、声乐家)双耳融合和互动的不同优势,并将其与同龄的非音乐家进行了比较。方法采用标准组比较研究设计,对6名年龄在20 ~ 40岁、听力正常的受试者进行双耳测试。研究对象分为三组,第一组为乐手26人,平均年龄17.73±2.83岁;第二组为乐手30人,平均年龄19.30±2.47岁;第三组为非乐手30人,平均年龄18.20±3.02岁。双耳过程即整合(二分音节测试,DST;和虚拟声空间识别- VASI)和相互作用(时间和水平的耳间差异阈值:ITD &;ILD),对所有参与者进行了治疗。结果统计分析表明,音乐修养是主要影响因素。Bonferroni配对测试显示,音乐家(乐器演奏家和声乐家)表现优异。0.05)非音乐家在所有测试中。音乐背景的差异优势在双耳整合测试中可以看到,乐器演奏家在VASI测试中的表现优于声乐演奏家,而在DST测试中反之亦然。在交互任务(ITD &在声乐家和器乐家之间(p >0.05)。结论与非音乐家相比,音乐背景导致的双耳技能差异优势可以被合理地注意到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Otology
Journal of Otology Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
461
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Otology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that publishes research findings from disciplines related to both clinical and basic science aspects of auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear. This journal welcomes submissions describing original experimental research that may improve our understanding of the mechanisms underlying problems of basic or clinical significance and treatment of patients with disorders of the auditory and vestibular systems. In addition to original papers the journal also offers invited review articles on current topics written by leading experts in the field. The journal is of primary importance for all scientists and practitioners interested in audiology, otology and neurotology, auditory neurosciences and related disciplines. Journal of Otology welcomes contributions from scholars in all countries and regions across the world.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Comparative utility of vestibular function tests in patients with peripheral and central vestibular dysfunction Co-infection with Neisseria mucosa in a patient with tuberculous otitis media A case report on a rare case of primary tuberculous otitis media The application of the strip-shaped cymba conchae orthosis in the nonsurgical correction of complex auricular deformity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1