Migration Coverage in Europe, Russia and the United States

Marcus Kreutler, S. Fengler, Nastaran Asadi, Svetlana Bodrunova, Halyna Budivska, Layire Diop, Georgia Ertz, Daria Gigola, Eszter Katus, Denisa Kovacs, Michał Kuś, Filip Láb, Anna A. Litvinenko, Johanna Mack, Scott R. Maier, Ana Pinto Martinho, A. Matei, Kaitlin C. Miller, Lisa Oppermann, Eva Pérez Vara, G. Polyák, Rajeev Ravisankar, Carlos Rodríguez Pérez, D. J. Semova, D. Skleparis, S. Splendore, S. Štefaniková, Adam Szynol, Décio Telo, Rrapo Zguri
{"title":"Migration Coverage in Europe, Russia and the United States","authors":"Marcus Kreutler, S. Fengler, Nastaran Asadi, Svetlana Bodrunova, Halyna Budivska, Layire Diop, Georgia Ertz, Daria Gigola, Eszter Katus, Denisa Kovacs, Michał Kuś, Filip Láb, Anna A. Litvinenko, Johanna Mack, Scott R. Maier, Ana Pinto Martinho, A. Matei, Kaitlin C. Miller, Lisa Oppermann, Eva Pérez Vara, G. Polyák, Rajeev Ravisankar, Carlos Rodríguez Pérez, D. J. Semova, D. Skleparis, S. Splendore, S. Štefaniková, Adam Szynol, Décio Telo, Rrapo Zguri","doi":"10.51480/1899-5101.15.2(31).2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Six years after the so-called ‘refugee crisis’ in 2015, the European Union remains divided on questions of migration and asylum policy. The issue also remains high on the agendas of the USA and Russia, two other key destination countries with immigration from Latin America and the Post-Soviet space. This article presents results from a comparative study of news coverage in 17 countries, focusing on 10 EU member states in Western and Central Eastern Europe (CEE), the USA and Russia. The intensity of coverage was remarkably different, with Hungary’s and Germany’s media standing out while Russian media displayed relatively low levels of coverage. Individual migrants and refugees were most visible in the two outlets from the USA. Media in CEE countries tended towards a more critical approach than media in Western Europe. However, differences between most countries’ pairs of analyzed media outlets indicate a more pluralistic debate than frequently assumed.","PeriodicalId":40610,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51480/1899-5101.15.2(31).2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Six years after the so-called ‘refugee crisis’ in 2015, the European Union remains divided on questions of migration and asylum policy. The issue also remains high on the agendas of the USA and Russia, two other key destination countries with immigration from Latin America and the Post-Soviet space. This article presents results from a comparative study of news coverage in 17 countries, focusing on 10 EU member states in Western and Central Eastern Europe (CEE), the USA and Russia. The intensity of coverage was remarkably different, with Hungary’s and Germany’s media standing out while Russian media displayed relatively low levels of coverage. Individual migrants and refugees were most visible in the two outlets from the USA. Media in CEE countries tended towards a more critical approach than media in Western Europe. However, differences between most countries’ pairs of analyzed media outlets indicate a more pluralistic debate than frequently assumed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲、俄罗斯和美国的移民覆盖率
在2015年所谓的“难民危机”过去六年之后,欧盟在移民和庇护政策问题上仍然存在分歧。这个问题在美国和俄罗斯的议程上也很重要,这两个国家也是拉丁美洲和后苏联地区移民的主要目的地。本文介绍了对17个国家的新闻报道的比较研究结果,重点是西欧和中东欧(CEE)的10个欧盟成员国,美国和俄罗斯。报道的强度差别很大,匈牙利和德国的媒体表现突出,而俄罗斯媒体的报道水平相对较低。个人移民和难民在美国的两个出口中最为明显。与西欧的媒体相比,中东欧国家的媒体倾向于采取更为批判的做法。然而,大多数国家所分析的媒体渠道对之间的差异表明,辩论比通常认为的更为多元化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Central European Journal of Communication provides an international forum for empirical, critical and interpretative, quantitative and qualitative research examining the role of communication in Central Europe and beyond. The journal welcomes high quality research and analysis from diverse theoretical and methodological approaches, as well as reviews of publications and publishes notes on a wide range of literature on media and communication studies. Submission of original articles is open to all researchers interested in communication and media.
期刊最新文献
Futures of algorithms and choices Imaginings of the Future of Conflict and Communication Technologies Future of Gender and Gender Equality Online Techno-pessimistic and techno-optimistic visions of surveillance and resistance in Europe Transforming Toxic Debates towards European Futures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1