EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE: OBVIOUS BENEFITS AND HIDDEN DRAWBACKS

Yakusevich V. V.
{"title":"EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE: OBVIOUS BENEFITS AND HIDDEN DRAWBACKS","authors":"Yakusevich V. V.","doi":"10.25298/2616-5546-2023-7-1-6-14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article covers basic information on the comparative evaluation of drugs efficacy and safety from the standpoint of both clinical experience and evidence-based medicine. It is emphasized that despite all its advantages evidencebased medicine does not contradict the \"opinion-based medicine\". There have been presented the basic rules for conducting randomized clinical trials referred to as the most modern method of evidence collection. The main criteria of evidence are described. At the same time, it is emphasized that evidence-based medicine has its drawbacks. The main of them - is inability to transfer the results obtained in a clinical trial to the treatment of all patients with the disease in question. The principle of comparing results between clinical trial and real-world data (RWD / RWE) is described – the project RCT DUPLICATE. The author’s opinion on the main drawbacks in conducting and reporting clinical trials is presented. A number of ethical issues in clinical trials is evaluated. The author claims that the selection of optimal treatment strategy for a particular patient should rely on combination of evidence-based medicine, clinical experience, and historical data as well.","PeriodicalId":34878,"journal":{"name":"Gepatologiia i gastroenterologiia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gepatologiia i gastroenterologiia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25298/2616-5546-2023-7-1-6-14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article covers basic information on the comparative evaluation of drugs efficacy and safety from the standpoint of both clinical experience and evidence-based medicine. It is emphasized that despite all its advantages evidencebased medicine does not contradict the "opinion-based medicine". There have been presented the basic rules for conducting randomized clinical trials referred to as the most modern method of evidence collection. The main criteria of evidence are described. At the same time, it is emphasized that evidence-based medicine has its drawbacks. The main of them - is inability to transfer the results obtained in a clinical trial to the treatment of all patients with the disease in question. The principle of comparing results between clinical trial and real-world data (RWD / RWE) is described – the project RCT DUPLICATE. The author’s opinion on the main drawbacks in conducting and reporting clinical trials is presented. A number of ethical issues in clinical trials is evaluated. The author claims that the selection of optimal treatment strategy for a particular patient should rely on combination of evidence-based medicine, clinical experience, and historical data as well.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
循证医学:有利有弊
本文涵盖了从临床经验和循证医学的角度对药物疗效和安全性进行比较评估的基本信息。强调证据医学尽管有诸多优点,但与“观点医学”并不矛盾。已经提出了进行随机临床试验的基本规则,被称为最现代的证据收集方法。介绍了证据的主要标准。同时强调循证医学也有其弊端。其中最主要的问题是无法将临床试验的结果用于治疗所有有问题的患者。描述了临床试验和真实世界数据(RWD/RWE)之间比较结果的原理——RCT DUPLICATE项目。作者对临床试验进行和报告的主要缺点提出了看法。对临床试验中的一些伦理问题进行了评估。作者声称,为特定患者选择最佳治疗策略应结合循证医学、临床经验和历史数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
2 weeks
期刊最新文献
CLASSIFICATIONS AND NON-SURGICAL TREATMENT OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS IN ADULTS: A COMPARATIVE LITERATURE REVIEW EFFECT OF MEROPENEM AND IMICENEM ON MICROBIOCENOSIS AND MORPHOLOGY OF THE SMALL INTESTINE IN RATS DEVELOPMENT OF A DOMESTIC ENZYME IMMUNE TEST SYSTEM FOR DETECTION OF ANTI-HEV IGM IN BLOOD SERUM ANATOMICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL REASONING OF LIVER RESECTION USING HYDRODISSECTION TECHNIQUE EFFECTIVENESS OF PORTAL BLOOD FLOW OCCLUSION TECHNIQUES WHEN PLANNING EXTENSIVE RESECTIONS IN PATIENTS WITH LIVER ECHINOCOCCOSIS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1