Educación sexual: Percepciones de docentes de la ciudad de Cuenca 2013-2014

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Revista Electronica Educare Pub Date : 2017-09-19 DOI:10.15359/REE.22-1.5
Diana Elisabeth Manzano-Pauta, Elena Jerves-Hermida
{"title":"Educación sexual: Percepciones de docentes de la ciudad de Cuenca 2013-2014","authors":"Diana Elisabeth Manzano-Pauta, Elena Jerves-Hermida","doi":"10.15359/REE.22-1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recognition given to the role teachers play in sex education, and, at the same time, the apparent lack of knowledge in the area of sexuality, reflected in current literature, has led to the development of this research study. The objective of this study was to know the teachers’ perceptions about sex education in Cuenca. Specifically, we aimed to understand the assessment they have about their own knowledge, teacher satisfaction, modality, conceptions and teachers’ prejudices in classrooms. The mixed method used a sequential, explanatory strategy according to which, during the first stage, we explored the teachers’ perceptions about sex education, using a quantitative study with a survey applied to 180 teachers. Based on the results of the quantitative phase, in the second stage, the teachers’ opinions were collected through a qualitative inquiry by implementing focus group discussions. The results are shown in four categories: 1) assessment of knowledge; 2) teaching satisfaction; 3) modality; and 4) conceptions and prejudices about sex education. The categories of the study showed that sex education presents shortcomings especially related to the lack of training and knowledge in teachers, resulting in providing an education with the same prejudices that those teachers have about sexuality.","PeriodicalId":37416,"journal":{"name":"Revista Electronica Educare","volume":"22 1","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15359/REE.22-1.5","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Electronica Educare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15359/REE.22-1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The recognition given to the role teachers play in sex education, and, at the same time, the apparent lack of knowledge in the area of sexuality, reflected in current literature, has led to the development of this research study. The objective of this study was to know the teachers’ perceptions about sex education in Cuenca. Specifically, we aimed to understand the assessment they have about their own knowledge, teacher satisfaction, modality, conceptions and teachers’ prejudices in classrooms. The mixed method used a sequential, explanatory strategy according to which, during the first stage, we explored the teachers’ perceptions about sex education, using a quantitative study with a survey applied to 180 teachers. Based on the results of the quantitative phase, in the second stage, the teachers’ opinions were collected through a qualitative inquiry by implementing focus group discussions. The results are shown in four categories: 1) assessment of knowledge; 2) teaching satisfaction; 3) modality; and 4) conceptions and prejudices about sex education. The categories of the study showed that sex education presents shortcomings especially related to the lack of training and knowledge in teachers, resulting in providing an education with the same prejudices that those teachers have about sexuality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
性教育:昆卡市2013-2014年教师的看法
教师在性教育中所扮演的角色得到了认可,同时,当前文献中反映出的在性领域明显缺乏知识,导致了这项研究的发展。本研究旨在了解昆卡市教师对性教育的认知。具体而言,我们旨在了解他们对自己的知识、教师满意度、模式、观念和教师在课堂上的偏见的评估。混合方法使用了一种顺序的解释策略,根据该策略,在第一阶段,我们使用了一项定量研究,对180名教师进行了调查,探讨了教师对性教育的看法。在定量阶段的结果基础上,在第二阶段,通过实施焦点小组讨论,通过定性调查收集教师的意见。研究结果分为四类:1)知识评估;2) 教学满意度;3) 模态;(4)对性教育的观念和偏见。研究的类别表明,性教育存在缺陷,尤其是与教师缺乏培训和知识有关,导致提供的教育与这些教师对性的偏见相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Electronica Educare
Revista Electronica Educare Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: Educare Electronic Journal is edited and published by the Center for Research and Teaching in Education (Centro de Investigación y Docencia en Educación) from the Universidad Nacional (National University, Costa Rica). It is an international, quarterly, academic publication. Educare’s aim is to disseminate academic production in the area of Education, both nationally and internationally, allowing authors to communicate their findings, and readers, the possibility to discover the extensive work related to the discipline and its impact and relationship with other fields of knowledge. In search of the construction of interdisciplinary pedagogical thought, the Journal seeks academic reflection; the discussion and analysis of the published knowledge; the incorporation of new perspectives; the reference to innovation and the presentation of successful methodological applications. Aware of the wide range of expressions in this discipline, from theoretical conceptualizations to practical exercises, Educare offers a space for exchange, dissemination and promotion of Education.
期刊最新文献
Creando Espacio para la Etnografía Visual en la Investigación Educativa Educación sexual: Percepciones de docentes de la ciudad de Cuenca 2013-2014 Phillipson’s Linguistic Imperialism Revisited at the light of Latin American Decoloniality Approach Educación superior inclusiva: Un reto para las prácticas pedagógicas Students with Attention Deficit Disorder Carrying out Tasks of Reading Comprehension and Text Production: A Comparative Study in 4th-Grade Students of Primary Education in Chile
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1