Documenting Georeferenced Social Science Survey Data: Limits of Metadata Standards and Possible Solutions

IF 0.3 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Journal of Map & Geography Libraries Pub Date : 2019-01-02 DOI:10.1080/15420353.2019.1659903
Stefan Jünger, Kerrin Borschewski, W. Zenk-Möltgen
{"title":"Documenting Georeferenced Social Science Survey Data: Limits of Metadata Standards and Possible Solutions","authors":"Stefan Jünger, Kerrin Borschewski, W. Zenk-Möltgen","doi":"10.1080/15420353.2019.1659903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we present documentation of the georeferenced social science survey data that are spatially linked to geospatial data attributes. We introduce the challenges of documentation, as different metadata standards are used for both data sources: social science survey data and geospatial data. In particular, we analyze the extent to which the social sciences metadata standard DDI Lifecycle is capable of incorporating the geosciences metadata standard ISO 19115. We find that the most challenging attributes to describe are those concerning the geographic structure of the geospatial data, especially if they stem from different sources. To navigate these issues, we developed and evaluated four workaround approaches which we demonstrate in a case study on the georeferenced German General Social Survey. Because not all of the approaches apply equally to every research project and institution, we provide a scheme to assist in making informed and weighted decisions.","PeriodicalId":54009,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Map & Geography Libraries","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15420353.2019.1659903","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Map & Geography Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15420353.2019.1659903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this article, we present documentation of the georeferenced social science survey data that are spatially linked to geospatial data attributes. We introduce the challenges of documentation, as different metadata standards are used for both data sources: social science survey data and geospatial data. In particular, we analyze the extent to which the social sciences metadata standard DDI Lifecycle is capable of incorporating the geosciences metadata standard ISO 19115. We find that the most challenging attributes to describe are those concerning the geographic structure of the geospatial data, especially if they stem from different sources. To navigate these issues, we developed and evaluated four workaround approaches which we demonstrate in a case study on the georeferenced German General Social Survey. Because not all of the approaches apply equally to every research project and institution, we provide a scheme to assist in making informed and weighted decisions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
记录地理参考社会科学调查数据:元数据标准的局限性和可能的解决方案
在本文中,我们提供了与地理空间数据属性在空间上链接的地理参考社会科学调查数据的文档。我们介绍了文档的挑战,因为两种数据源都使用了不同的元数据标准:社会科学调查数据和地理空间数据。特别是,我们分析了社会科学元数据标准DDI Lifecycle能够在多大程度上纳入地球科学元数据标准ISO 19115。我们发现,最具挑战性的描述属性是与地理空间数据的地理结构有关的属性,特别是如果它们来自不同的来源。为了解决这些问题,我们开发并评估了四种变通方法,我们在地理参考的德国一般社会调查的案例研究中展示了这些方法。由于并非所有的方法都平等地适用于每个研究项目和机构,我们提供了一个方案来帮助做出知情和加权的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Map & Geography Libraries
Journal of Map & Geography Libraries INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
83.30%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: The Journal of Map & Geography Libraries is a multidisciplinary publication that covers international research and information on the production, procurement, processing, and utilization of geographic and cartographic materials and geospatial information. Papers submitted undergo a rigorous peer-review process by professors, researchers, and practicing librarians with a passion for geography, cartographic materials, and the mapping and spatial sciences. The journal accepts original theory-based, case study, and practical papers that substantially advance an understanding of the mapping sciences in all of its forms to support users of map and geospatial collections, archives, and similar institutions.
期刊最新文献
To Archive or to Access? Toward a Rationale for Digital-Map Collecting at the Legal Deposit Libraries of the UK and Ireland Best Paper of the Year Award for Volume 18 User-Driven Toponym Disambiguation Using Dialogue Evaluation of Placename Geoparsers Spatial Hypertexts or Hypermaps: A Proposal for using Maps as Hypertexts in Geo-Spatial Archives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1