Clinical Audit on Examination Tools Used by Physical Therapists in Metro Manila in Examining Conditions with Neck Pain

PJAHS Pub Date : 2021-02-01 DOI:10.36413/PJAHS.0402.003
Arlene Chiong Maya, Christopher I. Cruz, Hymn Nuntasomsaran, Pauline Alyssa Vega, J. Tan, Jerome Jr. Rivera, Vanessa Regina Guevarra
{"title":"Clinical Audit on Examination Tools Used by Physical Therapists in Metro Manila in Examining Conditions with Neck Pain","authors":"Arlene Chiong Maya, Christopher I. Cruz, Hymn Nuntasomsaran, Pauline Alyssa Vega, J. Tan, Jerome Jr. Rivera, Vanessa Regina Guevarra","doi":"10.36413/PJAHS.0402.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Neck pain is considered the fourth leading cause of disability, with an annual prevalence rate of 15 to 30%. Using evidence-based practice in neck pain examination is a vital part of the rehabilitation process as it serves as a basis for determining the best treatment. The objective of the study is to determine the usage of recommended examination tool for neck pain among the physical therapists in selected hospitals and clinics in Metro Manila. Methods: The study has three distinct phases wherein phase 1 was the development and validation of a data extraction sheet, phase 2 was the assessment of interrater reliability among the investigators who will perform the chart review, and phase 3 was the chart review process. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis. Results: In phase 1, the contents of the data extraction sheet were found to be valid. In phase 2, the inter-rater reliability was 96.7% percent. In phase 3, the visual analogue scale was the most commonly used examination tool, yielding a 54% usage. This was followed by cervical range of motion & cervical manual muscle testing (22%), palpation (15%), sensory testing (7%), postural assessment (6%), special test (4%), ocular inspection (2%), functional assessment (1%), Functional Index Measure (1%) and functional muscle testing (1%). Neck Disability Index, which was one of the literature-recommended examination tools, was not used. Conclusion: Visual analogue scale was the most commonly used examination tool in conditions with neck pain in selected hospitals and clinics in Metro Manila. Further investigation can be done in order to know the reasons for the use or nonuse of examination tools.","PeriodicalId":34443,"journal":{"name":"PJAHS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PJAHS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36413/PJAHS.0402.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Neck pain is considered the fourth leading cause of disability, with an annual prevalence rate of 15 to 30%. Using evidence-based practice in neck pain examination is a vital part of the rehabilitation process as it serves as a basis for determining the best treatment. The objective of the study is to determine the usage of recommended examination tool for neck pain among the physical therapists in selected hospitals and clinics in Metro Manila. Methods: The study has three distinct phases wherein phase 1 was the development and validation of a data extraction sheet, phase 2 was the assessment of interrater reliability among the investigators who will perform the chart review, and phase 3 was the chart review process. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis. Results: In phase 1, the contents of the data extraction sheet were found to be valid. In phase 2, the inter-rater reliability was 96.7% percent. In phase 3, the visual analogue scale was the most commonly used examination tool, yielding a 54% usage. This was followed by cervical range of motion & cervical manual muscle testing (22%), palpation (15%), sensory testing (7%), postural assessment (6%), special test (4%), ocular inspection (2%), functional assessment (1%), Functional Index Measure (1%) and functional muscle testing (1%). Neck Disability Index, which was one of the literature-recommended examination tools, was not used. Conclusion: Visual analogue scale was the most commonly used examination tool in conditions with neck pain in selected hospitals and clinics in Metro Manila. Further investigation can be done in order to know the reasons for the use or nonuse of examination tools.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马尼拉大都会物理治疗师在检查颈部疼痛情况时使用的检查工具的临床审计
背景:颈部疼痛被认为是导致残疾的第四大原因,年患病率为15%至30%。在颈部疼痛检查中使用循证实践是康复过程的重要组成部分,因为它是确定最佳治疗的基础。该研究的目的是确定马尼拉大都会选定医院和诊所的物理治疗师对颈部疼痛的推荐检查工具的使用情况。方法:研究分为三个不同的阶段,其中第一阶段是数据提取表的开发和验证,第二阶段是评估将执行图表审查的调查人员之间的相互可靠性,第三阶段是图表审查过程。采用描述性统计进行数据分析。结果:在第一阶段,数据提取表的内容是有效的。在第二阶段,评估者之间的信度为96.7%。在第3阶段,视觉模拟量表是最常用的检查工具,使用率为54%。其次是颈椎活动度和颈部手工肌肉测试(22%)、触诊(15%)、感觉测试(7%)、体位评估(6%)、特殊测试(4%)、眼部检查(2%)、功能评估(1%)、功能指数测量(1%)和功能肌肉测试(1%)。未使用文献推荐的检查工具之一颈部残疾指数。结论:视觉模拟量表是马尼拉大都会选定医院和诊所中最常用的颈部疼痛检查工具。为了了解使用或不使用检查工具的原因,可以进行进一步的调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Elements of Realistic Goal-Setting Model Telerehabilitation for Speech-Language Pathology in Community- Based Rehabilitation in the Philippines: A Feasibility Study The Family Therapy Engagement Model (FTEM) Occupational Therapy Models and Practice on Telehealth and Beyond Building Occupational Alliance for Therapy (BOAT) Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1