{"title":"Adapting to survive","authors":"Nikki van de Pol","doi":"10.1075/FOL.15046.POL","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper traces the semantic development of the English absolute construction from Old to Present-day English on the basis of\n extensive corpus data. It is observed that the absolute construction developed from a solely adverbial, strictly subordinate\n construction into a construction with a much larger range of functions, including quasi-coordinate constructions whose ‘addition’\n function comes close to that of and-coordinated finite clauses. This development involves an expansion of clausal\n status (from subordinate to anywhere between subordinate and quasi-coordinate) and a semantic expansion from typically adverbial\n meanings to any type of additional information. The process is claimed to have been facilitated by Middle English case loss and\n arguments for this facilitating role of case loss are adduced. It is then shown how these quasi-coordinate absolute constructions\n became more and more important as an absolute construction-function over time, as they were well-suited to the absolute\n construction’s high degree of syntactic independence. This evolution appears to have taken an opposite direction from the\n development of free adjuncts (Killie & Swann 2009: 339). This observation fits in\n well with the proposal that English ing-clauses form a network (Fonteyn &\n van de Pol 2015) in which each member maintains its own functional niche, rather than engaging in competition with one\n another.","PeriodicalId":44232,"journal":{"name":"Functions of Language","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Functions of Language","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/FOL.15046.POL","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
This paper traces the semantic development of the English absolute construction from Old to Present-day English on the basis of
extensive corpus data. It is observed that the absolute construction developed from a solely adverbial, strictly subordinate
construction into a construction with a much larger range of functions, including quasi-coordinate constructions whose ‘addition’
function comes close to that of and-coordinated finite clauses. This development involves an expansion of clausal
status (from subordinate to anywhere between subordinate and quasi-coordinate) and a semantic expansion from typically adverbial
meanings to any type of additional information. The process is claimed to have been facilitated by Middle English case loss and
arguments for this facilitating role of case loss are adduced. It is then shown how these quasi-coordinate absolute constructions
became more and more important as an absolute construction-function over time, as they were well-suited to the absolute
construction’s high degree of syntactic independence. This evolution appears to have taken an opposite direction from the
development of free adjuncts (Killie & Swann 2009: 339). This observation fits in
well with the proposal that English ing-clauses form a network (Fonteyn &
van de Pol 2015) in which each member maintains its own functional niche, rather than engaging in competition with one
another.
本文在大量语料库资料的基础上,追溯了古英语到现代英语绝对构式的语义发展。我们观察到,绝对结构从一个纯粹的状语,严格的从属结构发展到一个具有更大范围功能的结构,包括准坐标结构,其“加法”功能接近于和协调有限分句。这种发展包括小句地位的扩展(从从属到从属和准坐标之间的任何地方)和语义扩展,从典型的状语到任何类型的附加信息。这一过程被认为是由中古英语的case loss促进的,并引证了case loss促进作用的论点。然后展示了这些准坐标绝对结构是如何随着时间的推移,作为绝对结构函数变得越来越重要,因为它们非常适合绝对结构的高度句法独立性。这种演变似乎与免费兼职的发展方向相反(Killie & Swann 2009: 339)。这一观察结果与英语动词从句形成一个网络(Fonteyn & van de Pol 2015)的提议非常吻合,在这个网络中,每个成员都保持自己的功能定位,而不是相互竞争。
期刊介绍:
Functions of Language is an international journal of linguistics which explores the functionalist perspective on the organisation and use of natural language. It encourages the interplay of theory and description, and provides space for the detailed analysis, qualitative or quantitative, of linguistic data from a broad range of languages. Its scope is broad, covering such matters as prosodic phenomena in phonology, the clause in its communicative context, and regularities of pragmatics, conversation and discourse, as well as the interaction between the various levels of analysis. The overall purpose is to contribute to our understanding of how the use of languages in speech and writing has impacted, and continues to impact, upon the structure of those languages.