Structural Systems Comparison of Simply Supported PSC Box Girder Bridge Equipped with Elastomeric Rubber Bearing and Lead Rubber Bearing

Alvin Kurniawan Santoso, D. Sulistyo, A. Awaludin, Angga Fajar Setiawan, I. Satyarno, Sidiq Purnomo, Ignatius Harry
{"title":"Structural Systems Comparison of Simply Supported PSC Box Girder Bridge Equipped with Elastomeric Rubber Bearing and Lead Rubber Bearing","authors":"Alvin Kurniawan Santoso, D. Sulistyo, A. Awaludin, Angga Fajar Setiawan, I. Satyarno, Sidiq Purnomo, Ignatius Harry","doi":"10.9744/ced.24.1.19-30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study compares the influence of elastomeric rubber bearing (ERB) as the regular bearing support and lead rubber bearing (LRB) as the seismic isolation device on the seismic performance of a seven-span simply supported prestressed concrete (PSC) box girder bridge, which was analyzed using nonlinear time history analysis (NLTHA) with the OpenSees software. The results showed that the maximum pier responses and damage were smaller in models with LRB than with ERB. The bridge model using ERB occurred the slightest damage at levels II, while the one using LRB was at levels I. In addition, the highest seismic performance level in the model with ERB was at the operational limit. Meanwhile, the seismic performance in the model with LRB was at the fully operational limit. Thus, LRB was a good preference for improving the seismic performance and mitigating the damage due to the seismic excitation with a slender pier.","PeriodicalId":30107,"journal":{"name":"Civil Engineering Dimension","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Civil Engineering Dimension","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9744/ced.24.1.19-30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study compares the influence of elastomeric rubber bearing (ERB) as the regular bearing support and lead rubber bearing (LRB) as the seismic isolation device on the seismic performance of a seven-span simply supported prestressed concrete (PSC) box girder bridge, which was analyzed using nonlinear time history analysis (NLTHA) with the OpenSees software. The results showed that the maximum pier responses and damage were smaller in models with LRB than with ERB. The bridge model using ERB occurred the slightest damage at levels II, while the one using LRB was at levels I. In addition, the highest seismic performance level in the model with ERB was at the operational limit. Meanwhile, the seismic performance in the model with LRB was at the fully operational limit. Thus, LRB was a good preference for improving the seismic performance and mitigating the damage due to the seismic excitation with a slender pier.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
弹性橡胶支座与铅橡胶支座简支PSC箱梁桥结构体系比较
采用非线性时程分析(NLTHA)和OpenSees软件,比较了弹性橡胶支座(ERB)作为常规支座和铅橡胶支座(LRB)作为隔震装置对某七跨简支式预应力混凝土箱梁桥抗震性能的影响。结果表明:与ERB模型相比,LRB模型的最大桥墩响应和损伤更小;采用ERB的桥梁模型在II级损伤最小,而采用LRB的桥梁模型在i级损伤最小,并且ERB模型的最高抗震性能水平处于使用极限。同时,LRB模型的抗震性能达到了极限。因此,LRB对于提高细长桥墩的抗震性能和减轻地震作用造成的损伤是一种很好的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Laboratory Study on Vallejo and Scovazzo’s Methods in Estimating the Rheology Parameters of Bentonite and Kaolinite Muds Influence of Prefabrication on Job Satisfaction in The Construction Industry Stress Analysis of Pin Connections in Steel Box Girder with the Unibridge System using Finite Element Model Monitoring and Analysis of Coastline Changes in the Coastal Area of Bali Island, Indonesia Free-Vibration and Buckling Analyses of Beams using Kriging-Based Timoshenko Beam Elements with the Discrete Shear Gap Technique
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1