Application of "2+1" PAD class based on online course in medical statistics undergraduate teaching

Min Wei, Yachao Li, Z. Zeng, Qin Xue, Weizhong Chen
{"title":"Application of \"2+1\" PAD class based on online course in medical statistics undergraduate teaching","authors":"Min Wei, Yachao Li, Z. Zeng, Qin Xue, Weizhong Chen","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.2095-1485.2020.01.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo explore the effects of \"2+1\" PAD class based on online course in medical statistics undergraduate teaching. \n \n \nMethods \nA total of 326 clinical undergraduates who took medical statistics in the spring term of 2017 were randomly divided into experimental group (n=186) and control group (n=140). Students in the experimental group were taught by \"2+1\" teaching method, which included self-study on line, classroom teaching, discussion and so on. While students in the control group were taught traditionally. Feedbacks about the teaching progress and effects from the students in the two groups were compared. SAS 9.4 was used for quantitative data description, t-test and rank sum test. \n \n \nResults \naccording to the students, the online-based \"2+1\" teaching method paid more attention to interdisciplinarity than traditional method (P<0.01), and the new teaching method was more beneficial for the improvement of students' capacity (P=0.008) and more conducive for students to engaging in scientific research (P=0.012). Students in the experimental group had higher overall satisfaction scores (P<0.01) and better ability for solving comprehensive problems (P<0.01). \n \n \nConclusion \nThe \"2+1\" PAD class teaching model based on online courses has more advantages than traditional teaching methods does, which should be recommended and adopted in undergraduate teaching. \n \n \nKey words: \nHigher education; PAD class; Teaching effect","PeriodicalId":56557,"journal":{"name":"中华医学教育探索杂志","volume":"19 1","pages":"37-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华医学教育探索杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.2095-1485.2020.01.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To explore the effects of "2+1" PAD class based on online course in medical statistics undergraduate teaching. Methods A total of 326 clinical undergraduates who took medical statistics in the spring term of 2017 were randomly divided into experimental group (n=186) and control group (n=140). Students in the experimental group were taught by "2+1" teaching method, which included self-study on line, classroom teaching, discussion and so on. While students in the control group were taught traditionally. Feedbacks about the teaching progress and effects from the students in the two groups were compared. SAS 9.4 was used for quantitative data description, t-test and rank sum test. Results according to the students, the online-based "2+1" teaching method paid more attention to interdisciplinarity than traditional method (P<0.01), and the new teaching method was more beneficial for the improvement of students' capacity (P=0.008) and more conducive for students to engaging in scientific research (P=0.012). Students in the experimental group had higher overall satisfaction scores (P<0.01) and better ability for solving comprehensive problems (P<0.01). Conclusion The "2+1" PAD class teaching model based on online courses has more advantages than traditional teaching methods does, which should be recommended and adopted in undergraduate teaching. Key words: Higher education; PAD class; Teaching effect
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于网络课程的“2+1”PAD课堂在医学统计学本科教学中的应用
目的探讨基于网络课程的“2+1”PAD课程在医学统计学本科教学中的效果。方法选取2017年春季学期医学统计学专业临床本科生326名,随机分为实验组186名和对照组140名。实验组采用“2+1”教学法,包括网络自学、课堂教学、讨论等。而对照组的学生则接受传统教学。比较两组学生对教学进度和效果的反馈。采用SAS 9.4进行定量资料描述、t检验和秩和检验。结果学生认为网络“2+1”教学方式比传统教学方式更注重跨学科性(P<0.01),更有利于学生能力的提高(P=0.008),更有利于学生从事科学研究(P=0.012)。实验组学生总体满意度得分较高(P<0.01),解决综合问题能力较强(P<0.01)。结论基于网络课程的“2+1”PAD课堂教学模式比传统教学方式更具优势,值得在本科教学中推广采用。关键词:高等教育;垫类;教学效果
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5254
期刊最新文献
Application of formative evaluation based on Rain Classroom in clinical skills teaching Application of "micro-teaching assistant" interaction platform in the residents' standardized training of geriatrics department Enlightenment of Taiwan medical education model on standardized medical residency training in Mainland China Design of comprehensive nursing experiment project based on simulation technology for acute respiratory distress syndrome Problems and reflections on the construction of medical imaging technology specialty in affiliated hospitals of universities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1