Educating to belong: Policy and practice of mother-tongue instruction for migrant students in the Danish welfare state

IF 2.4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH European Educational Research Journal Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/14749041211054953
Jin Li, Nanna Ramsing Enemark
{"title":"Educating to belong: Policy and practice of mother-tongue instruction for migrant students in the Danish welfare state","authors":"Jin Li, Nanna Ramsing Enemark","doi":"10.1177/14749041211054953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores how the development of mother-tongue instruction (MTI) policies in the Danish welfare state have created varying notions of difference and sameness in the schooling of migrant students and how they experience these notions locally in practice. Based on an analysis of MTI’s policy history and oral history interviews with former migrant students, we analyse MTI policy development within the Danish welfare state as a primary case and discusses whether these developments seem to be unique to the Danish welfare state by considering (West) Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden as a comparative perspective. Noting the paradoxes and dynamics of the welfare-state policy of ‘school for all under one roof’ at the intersections between the policy and practice level, we posit that migrant students are regulated as a homogeneous group that is expected to be ‘the same’ but is simultaneously considered to be ‘different’ from other, majority students. The findings thus reveal the paradox of welfare-state education policies and practice: while macro scale policy for migrant education aims to emphasise difference through MTI, the social consequences at the micro level show the opposite; namely, that MTI produces feelings of sameness and belonging among migrant students.","PeriodicalId":47336,"journal":{"name":"European Educational Research Journal","volume":"22 1","pages":"114 - 132"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Educational Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14749041211054953","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article explores how the development of mother-tongue instruction (MTI) policies in the Danish welfare state have created varying notions of difference and sameness in the schooling of migrant students and how they experience these notions locally in practice. Based on an analysis of MTI’s policy history and oral history interviews with former migrant students, we analyse MTI policy development within the Danish welfare state as a primary case and discusses whether these developments seem to be unique to the Danish welfare state by considering (West) Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden as a comparative perspective. Noting the paradoxes and dynamics of the welfare-state policy of ‘school for all under one roof’ at the intersections between the policy and practice level, we posit that migrant students are regulated as a homogeneous group that is expected to be ‘the same’ but is simultaneously considered to be ‘different’ from other, majority students. The findings thus reveal the paradox of welfare-state education policies and practice: while macro scale policy for migrant education aims to emphasise difference through MTI, the social consequences at the micro level show the opposite; namely, that MTI produces feelings of sameness and belonging among migrant students.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为归属而教育:丹麦福利国家移民学生母语教学的政策与实践
本文探讨了丹麦福利国家母语教学政策的发展如何在移民学生的学校教育中产生了不同的差异和相同观念,以及他们在实践中如何在当地体验这些观念。基于对MTI政策历史的分析和对前移民学生的口述历史采访,我们以丹麦福利国家内部的MTI政策发展为主要案例进行了分析,并通过将(西方)德国、荷兰和瑞典作为比较视角,讨论了这些发展是否是丹麦福利国家独有的。注意到“一个屋檐下的全民学校”福利国家政策在政策和实践层面的交叉点上的悖论和动态,我们假设移民学生被监管为一个同质群体,被认为是“相同的”,但同时被认为与其他大多数学生“不同”。研究结果揭示了福利国家教育政策和实践的悖论:虽然移民教育的宏观政策旨在通过MTI强调差异,但微观层面的社会后果却恰恰相反;即MTI在流动学生中产生相同感和归属感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Educational Research Journal
European Educational Research Journal EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: The European Educational Research Journal (EERJ) is a scientific journal interested in the changing landscape of education research across Europe. Education research increasingly crosses the borders of the national through its subjects of study, scholarly collaborations and references. The EERJ publishes education research papers and special issues which include a reflection on how the European context and other related global or regional dynamics shape their educational research topics. The European Educational Research Journal publishes double-blind peer-reviewed papers in special issues and as individual articles. The EERJ reviews submitted papers on the basis of the quality of their argument, the contemporary nature of their work, and the level of ''speaking'' to the European audience. Policy-makers, administrators and practitioners with an interest in European issues are now invited to subscribe. The EERJ publishes peer reviewed articles, essay reviews and research reports (forms of research intelligence across Europe)
期刊最新文献
Teacher Change in an Era of Neo-Liberal Policies: A Neo-Institutional Analysis of Teachers' Perceptions of Their Professional Change Situated Learning in Young Romanian Roma Successful Learning Biographies ‘Engaging People and Ideas’: Memories, Meaning Making and the European Educational Research Association Gender equity in academic knowledge production: the influence of politics, power and precarity Pragmatic sociology and the economics of convention: Introducing a ‘novel’ approach to English-speaking education research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1