List Experiments, Political Sophistication, and Vote Buying: Experimental Evidence from Mexico

IF 1.6 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Journal of Politics in Latin America Pub Date : 2020-08-01 DOI:10.1177/1866802X20937713
Rodrigo Castro Cornejo, Ulises Beltrán
{"title":"List Experiments, Political Sophistication, and Vote Buying: Experimental Evidence from Mexico","authors":"Rodrigo Castro Cornejo, Ulises Beltrán","doi":"10.1177/1866802X20937713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research conducted list experiments to estimate the percentage of respondents who received electoral gifts during the 2015 legislative and the 2015 and 2017 subnational campaigns in Mexico. Consistent with recent studies on sensitive survey techniques, our research finds that list experiments seem to methodologically work better among more sophisticated voters (e.g. those with higher levels of education). Such findings suggest that previous studies that rely on list experiments tend to underestimate the percentage of voters who receive electoral gifts since this technique tends to work better among respondents who are, in fact, least likely to be targeted by clientelistic strategies. Given levels of education in the region, we suggest that research solely relying on list experiments approach its empirical findings with caution.","PeriodicalId":44885,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Politics in Latin America","volume":"12 1","pages":"219 - 234"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1866802X20937713","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Politics in Latin America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1866802X20937713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This research conducted list experiments to estimate the percentage of respondents who received electoral gifts during the 2015 legislative and the 2015 and 2017 subnational campaigns in Mexico. Consistent with recent studies on sensitive survey techniques, our research finds that list experiments seem to methodologically work better among more sophisticated voters (e.g. those with higher levels of education). Such findings suggest that previous studies that rely on list experiments tend to underestimate the percentage of voters who receive electoral gifts since this technique tends to work better among respondents who are, in fact, least likely to be targeted by clientelistic strategies. Given levels of education in the region, we suggest that research solely relying on list experiments approach its empirical findings with caution.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
清单实验、政治复杂性和贿选:来自墨西哥的实验证据
这项研究进行了列表实验,以估计在墨西哥2015年立法以及2015年和2017年国家以下各级竞选期间收到选举礼物的受访者的百分比。与最近对敏感调查技术的研究一致,我们的研究发现,在更老练的选民(例如教育水平较高的选民)中,列表实验似乎在方法上更有效。这些发现表明,以前依靠名单实验的研究往往低估了收到选举礼物的选民的百分比,因为这种技术往往在事实上最不可能成为客户主义策略目标的受访者中效果更好。考虑到该地区的教育水平,我们建议仅依靠列表实验的研究谨慎对待其实证结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Presidential Debates and Electoral Preferences in Weakly Institutionalised Democracies: Evidence From 32 Latin American Elections Researching the Gap: Women in Latin American Political Science Citizens’ Stability of Electoral Preferences in Chile Since the Social Upheaval Assessing Congressional Institutionalization and Political Elites’ Renewal in Latin America Through Legislative Amateurism Lessons from a Late Adopter: Feminist Advocacy, Democratizing Reforms, and Gender Quotas in Chile
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1