Issue Ownership and Agenda Setting in the 2019 Swiss National Elections

IF 2 2区 社会学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Swiss Political Science Review Pub Date : 2021-12-23 DOI:10.1111/spsr.12496
F. Gilardi, Theresa Gessler, M. Kubli, Stefan Müller
{"title":"Issue Ownership and Agenda Setting in the 2019 Swiss National Elections","authors":"F. Gilardi, Theresa Gessler, M. Kubli, Stefan Müller","doi":"10.1111/spsr.12496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 2019 Swiss national elections were characterized by the unusual prominence of two issues, environment and gender, whereas two staples of Swiss politics, immigration and Europe, were less dominant compared to previous elections. We study how, in this context, the media and party agenda were linked to issue ownership. Specifically, we consider whether political parties that own an issue could lead the media agenda and the agenda of other parties. Our analysis relies on all tweets and press releases of major Swiss political parties from January to October 2019 and 37,225 newspaper articles published during the same period. Results show, first, that the agenda-setting capacity of parties was restricted to the issue that received the least attention during the campaign (gender), and second, that the link between issue ownership and agenda setting is ambiguous. These findings suggest that during election campaigns, agenda setting may be largely exogenous to both parties and media. ∗Department of Political Science, University of Zurich (https://fabriziogilardi.org). †Department of Political Science, University of Zurich (https://theresagessler.eu). ‡Department of Political Science, University of Zurich(https://maelkubli.ch). §School of Politics and International Relations, University College Dublin (https://muellerstefan.net).","PeriodicalId":46785,"journal":{"name":"Swiss Political Science Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swiss Political Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12496","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The 2019 Swiss national elections were characterized by the unusual prominence of two issues, environment and gender, whereas two staples of Swiss politics, immigration and Europe, were less dominant compared to previous elections. We study how, in this context, the media and party agenda were linked to issue ownership. Specifically, we consider whether political parties that own an issue could lead the media agenda and the agenda of other parties. Our analysis relies on all tweets and press releases of major Swiss political parties from January to October 2019 and 37,225 newspaper articles published during the same period. Results show, first, that the agenda-setting capacity of parties was restricted to the issue that received the least attention during the campaign (gender), and second, that the link between issue ownership and agenda setting is ambiguous. These findings suggest that during election campaigns, agenda setting may be largely exogenous to both parties and media. ∗Department of Political Science, University of Zurich (https://fabriziogilardi.org). †Department of Political Science, University of Zurich (https://theresagessler.eu). ‡Department of Political Science, University of Zurich(https://maelkubli.ch). §School of Politics and International Relations, University College Dublin (https://muellerstefan.net).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2019年瑞士全国大选的议题归属和议程设定
2019年瑞士全国大选的特点是环境和性别这两个问题异常突出,而瑞士政治的两个主要议题——移民和欧洲——与之前的选举相比,不那么重要。在这种情况下,我们研究媒体和党的议程如何与问题所有权联系起来。具体来说,我们考虑拥有议题的政党是否可以领导媒体议程和其他政党的议程。我们的分析基于2019年1月至10月瑞士主要政党的所有推特和新闻稿,以及同期发表的37,225篇报纸文章。结果显示:第一,政党的议程设定能力局限于竞选期间最不受关注的议题(性别);第二,议题所有权与议程设定之间的联系是模糊的。这些发现表明,在竞选活动中,议程设置可能在很大程度上是外生的政党和媒体。苏黎世大学政治系* (https://fabriziogilardi.org)。†苏黎世大学政治学系(https://theresagessler.eu)。苏黎世大学政治学系(https://maelkubli.ch)。§都柏林大学政治与国际关系学院(https://muellerstefan.net)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Swiss Political Science Review
Swiss Political Science Review POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
47
期刊最新文献
Why do people give to their governments? Lab‐in‐the‐field evidence on the role of norms, social information, and political support Die Grünen in der Schweiz: Entwicklung – Wirken – Perspektiven/Les Vert‐e‐s en Suisse: Évolution – action – perspectivesSarahBütikofer and WernerSeitz (Eds.) Zurich, Seismo Press (2023), 228 p., ISBN 978–3–03777‐271‐3 (German)/ISBN 978–2–88351‐118‐7 (French) Direkte Demokratie in den GemeindenMartina FlickWitzig und AdrianVatter, Basel, NZZ Libro (2023), 207 S., ISBN 978–3–907396‐24‐7 Pacification through decentralization: An explanatory analysis of ethno‐territorial cabinet conflict in Belgium (1979–2006) Past the saturation point: Why voters switch from mainstream to niche parties and vice‐versa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1