The Croatian thousand-year dream

Q2 Social Sciences Narodna Umjetnost Pub Date : 2019-07-01 DOI:10.15176/vol56no101
Zrinka Breglec
{"title":"The Croatian thousand-year dream","authors":"Zrinka Breglec","doi":"10.15176/vol56no101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the phenomenon of nation as narrative. This approach is rooted in political theory, more specifically, in post-foundational thought and poststructuralist narratology. The article is significantly informed by the so-called performative turn, especially in historiography. It will therefore focus on narrative and hi/story, as it is understood by Rancière: as a discourse which originally belongs to literature yet keeps escaping it. Relying on a literary technique, history constitutes itself as a science: this is why we can approach it by employing methods similar, albeit not identical, to those used to approach literature. The main argument put forward in this article is that society, understood in Laclauian terms, does not exist, whereas the (Croatian) society effect, that is, the illusion of society as a totality, is produced by the narrative of the so-called Croatian thousand-year dream. In other words, what Hobsbawm dubs the invention of tradition is founded upon the narrative’s past, while the impact of the present of this narrative’s narration is excluded from the mechanisms of the ontology of nationalism.","PeriodicalId":38816,"journal":{"name":"Narodna Umjetnost","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15176/vol56no101","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Narodna Umjetnost","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15176/vol56no101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores the phenomenon of nation as narrative. This approach is rooted in political theory, more specifically, in post-foundational thought and poststructuralist narratology. The article is significantly informed by the so-called performative turn, especially in historiography. It will therefore focus on narrative and hi/story, as it is understood by Rancière: as a discourse which originally belongs to literature yet keeps escaping it. Relying on a literary technique, history constitutes itself as a science: this is why we can approach it by employing methods similar, albeit not identical, to those used to approach literature. The main argument put forward in this article is that society, understood in Laclauian terms, does not exist, whereas the (Croatian) society effect, that is, the illusion of society as a totality, is produced by the narrative of the so-called Croatian thousand-year dream. In other words, what Hobsbawm dubs the invention of tradition is founded upon the narrative’s past, while the impact of the present of this narrative’s narration is excluded from the mechanisms of the ontology of nationalism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
克罗地亚千年梦想
本文探讨民族作为叙事的现象。这种方法植根于政治理论,更具体地说,植根于后基础思想和后结构主义叙事学。这篇文章在很大程度上受到了所谓的表演转向的影响,尤其是在史学上。因此,它将专注于叙事和hi/story,正如ranci所理解的那样:作为一种原本属于文学却不断逃避文学的话语。依靠一种文学技巧,历史构成了一门科学:这就是为什么我们可以用与研究文学相似的方法来研究它,尽管不完全相同。本文提出的主要论点是,用拉克劳的术语来理解的社会是不存在的,而(克罗地亚)社会效应,即社会作为一个整体的幻觉,是由所谓克罗地亚千年梦的叙述产生的。换句话说,霍布斯鲍姆所谓的传统的发明是建立在叙事的过去之上的,而这种叙事的现在的影响则被排除在民族主义本体论的机制之外。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Narodna Umjetnost
Narodna Umjetnost Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Temporality of Humanitarian Care The Ethnography of Healing and Dying during the Coronavirus Pandemic from the Perspective of Medical Workers in Croatia O radu na Animalističkom leksikonu u okviru projekta Kulturna animalistika O Maji, Jobu i pčelama Zoomorfna obeležja duša pokojnika u verovanjima slovenskih naroda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1