Network neutrality in the European Union: A communications policy process analysis

IF 1 Q3 COMMUNICATION Internet Histories Pub Date : 2020-04-02 DOI:10.1080/24701475.2020.1749807
Stefan Gadringer
{"title":"Network neutrality in the European Union: A communications policy process analysis","authors":"Stefan Gadringer","doi":"10.1080/24701475.2020.1749807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Few Internet governance issues raised a similar level of public alertness, as it has been the case with network neutrality. Advocates in favour of strict rules feared the end of the Internet itself, while access providers fought against interferences in their business areas. The regulatory process in the European Union was multi-faceted and faced several key changes and turning points. This paper examines the positions at stake from the emergence of the network neutrality debate in 2009 during the amendment of the Telecom Single Market Directive to its aftermath in 2019. Focussing on the implications for public and private online communication, a normative and social value framework provides us with the basis for interpreting key developments. The methodological setting is a multi-method-design consisting of a comprehensive literature review, a document analysis as well as expert interviews with involved stakeholders. The results shed light on the importance of the EU Internet market, its characteristics and challenges and allow to draw a comprehensive image of the European Union’s performance in regulating network neutrality. Albeit the complex institutional setting slowed down the process, the outcome is characterized by the inclusion of multiple stakeholders and the possibility to adapt legal norms on a dynamic basis.","PeriodicalId":52252,"journal":{"name":"Internet Histories","volume":"4 1","pages":"178 - 195"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/24701475.2020.1749807","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Histories","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24701475.2020.1749807","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Few Internet governance issues raised a similar level of public alertness, as it has been the case with network neutrality. Advocates in favour of strict rules feared the end of the Internet itself, while access providers fought against interferences in their business areas. The regulatory process in the European Union was multi-faceted and faced several key changes and turning points. This paper examines the positions at stake from the emergence of the network neutrality debate in 2009 during the amendment of the Telecom Single Market Directive to its aftermath in 2019. Focussing on the implications for public and private online communication, a normative and social value framework provides us with the basis for interpreting key developments. The methodological setting is a multi-method-design consisting of a comprehensive literature review, a document analysis as well as expert interviews with involved stakeholders. The results shed light on the importance of the EU Internet market, its characteristics and challenges and allow to draw a comprehensive image of the European Union’s performance in regulating network neutrality. Albeit the complex institutional setting slowed down the process, the outcome is characterized by the inclusion of multiple stakeholders and the possibility to adapt legal norms on a dynamic basis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲联盟的网络中立性:通信政策过程分析
很少有互联网治理问题能像网络中立性问题那样引起公众的高度警觉。支持严格规定的人担心互联网本身的终结,而接入提供商则反对对其业务领域的干扰。欧盟的监管过程是多方面的,面临着几个关键的变化和转折点。本文研究了从2009年电信单一市场指令修正案期间出现的网络中立性辩论到2019年其后果的利害关系。关注公共和私人在线交流的影响,规范和社会价值框架为我们提供了解释关键发展的基础。方法设置是一个多方法的设计,包括一个全面的文献综述,一个文件分析,以及与相关利益相关者的专家访谈。结果揭示了欧盟互联网市场的重要性,其特点和挑战,并允许绘制欧盟在规范网络中立性方面的表现的全面形象。尽管复杂的制度环境减缓了这一进程,但其结果的特点是包含了多个利益攸关方,并有可能在动态的基础上调整法律规范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Internet Histories
Internet Histories Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
23.10%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
The Two Revolutions: A History of the Transgender Internet, by Avery Dame-Griff The Two Revolutions: A History of the Transgender Internet , by Avery Dame-Griff, New York, New York University Press, 2023. 272 pp., ISBN 9781479818310, $30 ­(paperback), $89 (hardcover) Early virtual science museums: when the technology is not mature Framing digital identities through social media in museums Digital Pierrot Museum from Pristina to the Moon: an interview with Willred Dallto An analysis of the role of digital technology in the online exhibition of the art museum in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area during the COVID-19 pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1