FAIR Equivalency, Regulatory Framework and Adoption Potential of FAIR Guidelines in Health in Kenya

IF 1.3 3区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Data Intelligence Pub Date : 2022-08-18 DOI:10.1162/dint_a_00175
E. Inau, Reginald Nalugala, William Muhadi Nandwa, Fredrick Obwanda, A. Wachira, A. Cartaxo
{"title":"FAIR Equivalency, Regulatory Framework and Adoption Potential of FAIR Guidelines in Health in Kenya","authors":"E. Inau, Reginald Nalugala, William Muhadi Nandwa, Fredrick Obwanda, A. Wachira, A. Cartaxo","doi":"10.1162/dint_a_00175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study explored the regulatory framework in Kenya that may facilitate the implementation of the FAIR Guidelines in health research, as well as the possibility of adopting the FAIR Guidelines at the national level. Fourteen key documents pivotal to the emerging digital health sector in Kenya were identified and analysed using a comprehensive coding and labelling approach based on a binary system for whether or not they mention the FAIR Guidelines or terms and vocabulary related to the FAIR Guidelines. The analysis revealed gaps in data stewardship that could be filled by the implementation of the FAIR Guidelines and, although the documents analysed do not explicitly mention the FAIR Guidelines, FAIR Equivalent terminology and practices are mentioned in varying detail. However, our analysis shows that there are still no provisions for the introduction and implementation of the FAIR Guidelines in health research in Kenya. Therefore, we recommend that the leadership be provided with a comprehensive introduction to the FAIR Guidelines, success stories about the FAIRification of data and research infrastructure in other parts of the world, and a demonstration of the steps needed for the FAIRification of health data in Kenya.","PeriodicalId":34023,"journal":{"name":"Data Intelligence","volume":"4 1","pages":"852-866"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Data Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/dint_a_00175","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Abstract This study explored the regulatory framework in Kenya that may facilitate the implementation of the FAIR Guidelines in health research, as well as the possibility of adopting the FAIR Guidelines at the national level. Fourteen key documents pivotal to the emerging digital health sector in Kenya were identified and analysed using a comprehensive coding and labelling approach based on a binary system for whether or not they mention the FAIR Guidelines or terms and vocabulary related to the FAIR Guidelines. The analysis revealed gaps in data stewardship that could be filled by the implementation of the FAIR Guidelines and, although the documents analysed do not explicitly mention the FAIR Guidelines, FAIR Equivalent terminology and practices are mentioned in varying detail. However, our analysis shows that there are still no provisions for the introduction and implementation of the FAIR Guidelines in health research in Kenya. Therefore, we recommend that the leadership be provided with a comprehensive introduction to the FAIR Guidelines, success stories about the FAIRification of data and research infrastructure in other parts of the world, and a demonstration of the steps needed for the FAIRification of health data in Kenya.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公平等效性、监管框架和肯尼亚卫生领域公平准则的采用潜力
摘要:本研究探讨了肯尼亚可能促进公平准则在卫生研究中的实施的监管框架,以及在国家层面采用公平准则的可能性。使用基于二进制系统的综合编码和标签方法,确定并分析了对肯尼亚新兴数字卫生部门至关重要的14份关键文件,以确定它们是否提到FAIR指南或与FAIR指南相关的术语和词汇。分析揭示了数据管理方面的差距,这些差距可以通过实施公平指南来填补,尽管分析的文件没有明确提到公平指南,但公平等效的术语和实践以不同的细节被提及。然而,我们的分析表明,肯尼亚在卫生研究中仍然没有引入和实施公平准则的规定。因此,我们建议向领导层全面介绍《公平准则》,介绍世界其他地区数据和研究基础设施公平化的成功案例,并展示肯尼亚卫生数据公平化所需的步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Data Intelligence
Data Intelligence COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
40
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Limitations and Ethical Considerations of ChatGPT Rule Mining Trends from 1987 to 2022: A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization Classification and quantification of timestamp data quality issues and its impact on data quality outcome BIKAS: Bio-Inspired Knowledge Acquisition and Simulacrum—A Knowledge Database to Support Multifunctional Design Concept Generation Exploring Attentive Siamese LSTM for Low-Resource Text Plagiarism Detection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1