Accuracy of 2D and point shear wave elastography-based measurements for diagnosis of esophageal varices: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Pub Date : 2022-01-14 DOI:10.5152/dir.2022.21730
Xing Zhang, Chunxiao Chen, Chung-Yih Yan, Taoyan Song
{"title":"Accuracy of 2D and point shear wave elastography-based measurements for diagnosis of esophageal varices: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Xing Zhang, Chunxiao Chen, Chung-Yih Yan, Taoyan Song","doi":"10.5152/dir.2022.21730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE The aim of this meta-analysis is to summarize the diagnostic accuracies of point shear wave elas- tography (pSWE) and two-dimensional (2D) SWE for esophageal varices (EV) and varices needing treatment (VNT). METHODS We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. We searched for studies reporting the EV and VNT diagnostic accuracy of pSWE and 2D SWE using PubMed Cen- tral, SCOPUS, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases. STATA software\"Midas\"package was used for meta-analysis. RESULTS A total of 24 studies with 3867 patients were included in the review. Pooled score sensitivities of pSWE were 91% (95% CI, 80%-96%) for EV, and 94% (95% CI, 86%-97%) for VNT. Pooled score sensi- tivities of 2D SWE were 78% (95% CI, 69%-85%) for EV, and 79% (95% CI, 72%-85%) for VNT. Pooled score specificities of pSWE were 70% (95% CI, 60%-78%) for EV, and 59% (95% CI, 40%-75%) for VNT. Pooled score specificities of 2D SWE for EV were 79% (95% CI, 72%-85%) 72% (95% CI, 66%-77%) for VNT. We found significant heterogeneity for all the elastography-based measurements with the chi- square test results and an I2 statistic >75%. CONCLUSION Both pSWE and 2D SWE can diagnose EV and VNT with moderate diagnostic accuracy. Further large- scale setting-specific longitudinal studies are required to establish the best modality.","PeriodicalId":50582,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/dir.2022.21730","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

PURPOSE The aim of this meta-analysis is to summarize the diagnostic accuracies of point shear wave elas- tography (pSWE) and two-dimensional (2D) SWE for esophageal varices (EV) and varices needing treatment (VNT). METHODS We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. We searched for studies reporting the EV and VNT diagnostic accuracy of pSWE and 2D SWE using PubMed Cen- tral, SCOPUS, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases. STATA software"Midas"package was used for meta-analysis. RESULTS A total of 24 studies with 3867 patients were included in the review. Pooled score sensitivities of pSWE were 91% (95% CI, 80%-96%) for EV, and 94% (95% CI, 86%-97%) for VNT. Pooled score sensi- tivities of 2D SWE were 78% (95% CI, 69%-85%) for EV, and 79% (95% CI, 72%-85%) for VNT. Pooled score specificities of pSWE were 70% (95% CI, 60%-78%) for EV, and 59% (95% CI, 40%-75%) for VNT. Pooled score specificities of 2D SWE for EV were 79% (95% CI, 72%-85%) 72% (95% CI, 66%-77%) for VNT. We found significant heterogeneity for all the elastography-based measurements with the chi- square test results and an I2 statistic >75%. CONCLUSION Both pSWE and 2D SWE can diagnose EV and VNT with moderate diagnostic accuracy. Further large- scale setting-specific longitudinal studies are required to establish the best modality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于二维和点剪切波弹性成像的测量对食管静脉曲张诊断的准确性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
目的:本meta分析的目的是总结点横波断层(pSWE)和二维(2D) SWE对食管静脉曲张(EV)和需要治疗的静脉曲张(VNT)的诊断准确性。方法:我们对诊断准确性研究进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。我们使用PubMed center、SCOPUS、MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane数据库检索了报道pSWE和2D SWE的EV和VNT诊断准确性的研究。采用STATA软件“Midas”软件包进行meta分析。结果共纳入24项研究,3867例患者。pSWE对EV的合并评分敏感性为91% (95% CI, 80%-96%),对VNT的合并评分敏感性为94% (95% CI, 86%-97%)。2D SWE的合并评分敏感性对于EV为78% (95% CI, 69%-85%),对于VNT为79% (95% CI, 72%-85%)。pSWE的EV合并评分特异性为70% (95% CI, 60%-78%), VNT合并评分特异性为59% (95% CI, 40%-75%)。2D SWE对EV的合并评分特异性为79% (95% CI, 72%-85%),对VNT的合并评分特异性为72% (95% CI, 66%-77%)。我们发现所有基于弹性学的测量结果具有显著的异质性,卡方检验结果和I2统计量为75%。结论pSWE和2D SWE均能诊断EV和VNT,诊断正确率中等。需要进一步的大规模特定环境的纵向研究来确定最佳模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (Diagn Interv Radiol) is the open access, online-only official publication of Turkish Society of Radiology. It is published bimonthly and the journal’s publication language is English. The journal is a medium for original articles, reviews, pictorial essays, technical notes related to all fields of diagnostic and interventional radiology.
期刊最新文献
Application of deep learning and radiomics in the prediction of hematoma expansion in intracerebral hemorrhage: a fully automated hybrid approach. Diagnostic value of qualitative and quantitative enhancement parameters on contrast-enhanced mammography. Post-contrast abdominal magnetic resonance imaging of critically ill patients using compressed sensing free-breathing golden radial angle imaging. The effect of MWA protocols upon morphology and IVIM parameters of hepatic ablation zones-a preliminary in vivo animal study with an MRI-compatible microwave ablation device. Percutaneous sclerotherapy using a 4 F pigtail catheter and 40 milliliters of 5% ethanolamine oleate for symptomatic large hepatic cysts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1