How culture influences the strengthening of market principles in conservative welfare states: The case of long-term care policy

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 Q3 SOCIAL WORK International Journal of Social Welfare Pub Date : 2023-05-07 DOI:10.1111/ijsw.12612
Thurid Eggers, Christopher Grages, Birgit Pfau-Effinger
{"title":"How culture influences the strengthening of market principles in conservative welfare states: The case of long-term care policy","authors":"Thurid Eggers,&nbsp;Christopher Grages,&nbsp;Birgit Pfau-Effinger","doi":"10.1111/ijsw.12612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>How much, and in what ways, do cultural ideas contribute to understanding cross-national differences in the extent of long-term care (LTC) policy marketisation? We argue that differences in cultural ideas in the political sphere about ‘ideal’ ways of organising the provision of care shed light on these differences, relatively independently of the governing parties' positions on the left/right spectrum. Our comparative case study of two conservative welfare states, Germany and Austria, supports this argument. LTC policy marketisation in the mid-1990s was, in both cases, based on left-libertarian ideas. While these ideas gained strong political support from parties across the left/right spectrum in Austria, they were combined with etatist ideas in Germany, resulting in a substantially lower potential for marketisation in Germany's LTC policy. Our study also shows that, by contrast with neo-liberal ideas, left-libertarian ideas address care recipients' self-determination and divert attention away from social problems associated with LTC marketisation.</p>","PeriodicalId":47567,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social Welfare","volume":"33 2","pages":"413-426"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijsw.12612","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social Welfare","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijsw.12612","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How much, and in what ways, do cultural ideas contribute to understanding cross-national differences in the extent of long-term care (LTC) policy marketisation? We argue that differences in cultural ideas in the political sphere about ‘ideal’ ways of organising the provision of care shed light on these differences, relatively independently of the governing parties' positions on the left/right spectrum. Our comparative case study of two conservative welfare states, Germany and Austria, supports this argument. LTC policy marketisation in the mid-1990s was, in both cases, based on left-libertarian ideas. While these ideas gained strong political support from parties across the left/right spectrum in Austria, they were combined with etatist ideas in Germany, resulting in a substantially lower potential for marketisation in Germany's LTC policy. Our study also shows that, by contrast with neo-liberal ideas, left-libertarian ideas address care recipients' self-determination and divert attention away from social problems associated with LTC marketisation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
文化如何影响保守福利国家加强市场原则:以长期护理政策为例
文化观念对理解长期护理(LTC)政策市场化程度的跨国差异有多大帮助?我们认为,政治领域中关于组织提供护理的 "理想 "方式的文化观念的差异,相对独立于执政党在左/右光谱上的立场,揭示了这些差异。我们对德国和奥地利这两个保守福利国家的比较研究支持了这一论点。20 世纪 90 年代中期的长期护理政策市场化都是以左翼自由主义思想为基础的。在奥地利,这些理念得到了左/右翼政党的大力支持,而在德国,这些理念则与埃塔主义理念相结合,导致德国长期护理政策市场化的潜力大大降低。我们的研究还表明,与新自由主义思想相比,左翼自由主义思想关注护理对象的自决权,并将人们的注意力从与长期护理市场化相关的社会问题上转移开。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Social Welfare publishes original articles in English on social welfare and social work. Its interdisciplinary approach and comparative perspective promote examination of the most pressing social welfare issues of the day by researchers from the various branches of the applied social sciences. The journal seeks to disseminate knowledge and to encourage debate about these issues and their regional and global implications.
期刊最新文献
The significance of crisis identification using community‐driven model Issue Information Whose children are we concerned about, and why? A cohort study of sociodemographic referral patterns to the Norwegian child welfare system Trajectories of NEET in individuals formerly placed in out‐of‐home care: A Swedish national cohort study COVID‐19 and support for basic income in Korea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1