Reliable cognitive change following unilateral deep brain stimulation in essential tremor.

IF 17.7 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2022-03-15 DOI:10.1080/23279095.2022.2048303
Stephanie Kielb, Claire Speelman, Laura Boxley, Darrin Aase, Erica Dawson, Barbara Changizi, Aristide Merola, Vibhor Krishna, Christopher Nguyen
{"title":"Reliable cognitive change following unilateral deep brain stimulation in essential tremor.","authors":"Stephanie Kielb, Claire Speelman, Laura Boxley, Darrin Aase, Erica Dawson, Barbara Changizi, Aristide Merola, Vibhor Krishna, Christopher Nguyen","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2022.2048303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This retrospective analysis assessed regression-based reliable change (RC) of cognition in a sample of essential tremor (ET) patients who underwent unilateral deep brain stimulation of the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus (VIM-DBS).<b>Method:</b> Thirty patients (mean age at pre-evaluation = 70.4 ± 6.3 years) underwent neuropsychological evaluation pre- and post-unilateral VIM-DBS placement (mean time between pre and post-evaluation = 13.1 ± 4.0 months). Paired samples <i>t</i>-tests and RC analyses were employed.<b>Results:</b> No significant within-group differences were observed when cognitive scores were compared between evaluations. The vast majority of patients demonstrated stability across pre-and post-surgical evaluations (i.e. 29 out of 30); however, those with high-risk co-morbid medical conditions may be vulnerable to post-surgical cognitive decline as indicated by RC measures.<b>Conclusions:</b> The use of regression-based RC indices to assess individual cognitive changes between pre and post-surgical evaluations control for systematic and measurement errors that can occur over repeated evaluations, and may be able to identify cognitive changes that evade detection in traditional within-group comparisons.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":" ","pages":"601-605"},"PeriodicalIF":17.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2022.2048303","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/3/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This retrospective analysis assessed regression-based reliable change (RC) of cognition in a sample of essential tremor (ET) patients who underwent unilateral deep brain stimulation of the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus (VIM-DBS).Method: Thirty patients (mean age at pre-evaluation = 70.4 ± 6.3 years) underwent neuropsychological evaluation pre- and post-unilateral VIM-DBS placement (mean time between pre and post-evaluation = 13.1 ± 4.0 months). Paired samples t-tests and RC analyses were employed.Results: No significant within-group differences were observed when cognitive scores were compared between evaluations. The vast majority of patients demonstrated stability across pre-and post-surgical evaluations (i.e. 29 out of 30); however, those with high-risk co-morbid medical conditions may be vulnerable to post-surgical cognitive decline as indicated by RC measures.Conclusions: The use of regression-based RC indices to assess individual cognitive changes between pre and post-surgical evaluations control for systematic and measurement errors that can occur over repeated evaluations, and may be able to identify cognitive changes that evade detection in traditional within-group comparisons.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
原发性震颤单侧深部脑刺激后可靠的认知变化。
目的:本回顾性分析评估了接受单侧丘脑腹侧中间核(VIM-DBS)脑深部刺激的原发性震颤(ET)患者样本的认知的基于回归的可靠变化(RC) ± 6.3 年)接受了单侧VIM-DBS植入前后的神经心理学评估(评估前后的平均时间=13.1 ± 4 月)。采用配对样本t检验和RC分析。结果:当比较评估之间的认知得分时,没有观察到显著的组内差异。绝大多数患者在术前和术后评估中表现出稳定性(即30例中有29例);然而,正如RC测量所表明的那样,那些患有高风险合并疾病的患者可能容易出现术后认知能力下降。结论:使用基于回归的RC指数来评估手术前和手术后评估之间的个体认知变化,可以控制重复评估中可能出现的系统性和测量性错误,并可能能够识别传统组内比较中无法检测到的认知变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "Do All Isolated Traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhages Need to Be Transferred to a Level 1 Trauma Center?" Proton-Coupled Electron and Energy Transfer in Molecular Triads. Chromenylium and Flavylium Polymethine Fluorophores Light Up the Shortwave Infrared Region Construction and Application of Nucleic Acids-Based Biomolecular Condensates Chemical Editing of Proteins: From a Specific Residue to Functional Domains.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1