Micro-narratives of the ancestors: worship, censure, and empathy in family hi(stories)

IF 0.5 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY Rethinking History Pub Date : 2021-04-03 DOI:10.1080/13642529.2021.1928392
Emma Shaw, D. Donnelly
{"title":"Micro-narratives of the ancestors: worship, censure, and empathy in family hi(stories)","authors":"Emma Shaw, D. Donnelly","doi":"10.1080/13642529.2021.1928392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Family history research has become one of the most popular pastimes in the world due to digital advances and the resulting democratization of historical records. For many, family history research is a heuristic in which to make empathetic connections with their ancestors they will never (and can never) meet due to the barriers of temporal, geographical and intergenerational distance. The resulting family histories reconstruct and re-tell social history through the micro-historical lens of the individual. It has been claimed that this intimate connection between researchers and their familial narrative can heighten empathetic responses and lead to interpretations and assumptions beyond the evidence. This paper examines this proposition by analyzing qualitative data drawn from a large survey that examined the beliefs and practices of Australian family historians. The data supported their use of historical imagination as a catalyst for historical interpretation and meaning-making, and the well-established Ashby and Lee’s (1987) stages of historical empathy was used to gauge depth of understanding. The research concludes that for many family history researchers, micro-narratives of their ancestors evoked a wide range of empathetic responses ranging from the elementary to the nuanced and sophisticated.","PeriodicalId":46004,"journal":{"name":"Rethinking History","volume":"25 1","pages":"207 - 223"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13642529.2021.1928392","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rethinking History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13642529.2021.1928392","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Family history research has become one of the most popular pastimes in the world due to digital advances and the resulting democratization of historical records. For many, family history research is a heuristic in which to make empathetic connections with their ancestors they will never (and can never) meet due to the barriers of temporal, geographical and intergenerational distance. The resulting family histories reconstruct and re-tell social history through the micro-historical lens of the individual. It has been claimed that this intimate connection between researchers and their familial narrative can heighten empathetic responses and lead to interpretations and assumptions beyond the evidence. This paper examines this proposition by analyzing qualitative data drawn from a large survey that examined the beliefs and practices of Australian family historians. The data supported their use of historical imagination as a catalyst for historical interpretation and meaning-making, and the well-established Ashby and Lee’s (1987) stages of historical empathy was used to gauge depth of understanding. The research concludes that for many family history researchers, micro-narratives of their ancestors evoked a wide range of empathetic responses ranging from the elementary to the nuanced and sophisticated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
祖先的微观叙事:家庭嗨(故事)中的崇拜、谴责和移情
摘要由于数字技术的进步和历史记录的民主化,家族史研究已成为世界上最受欢迎的消遣方式之一。对许多人来说,家族史研究是一种启发式方法,可以与他们的祖先建立同理心的联系,因为时间、地理和代际距离的障碍,他们永远不会(也永远不会)遇到。由此产生的家族史通过个体的微观历史镜头来重构和重新讲述社会历史。有人声称,研究人员与其家庭叙事之间的这种亲密联系可以增强同理心反应,并导致证据之外的解释和假设。本文通过分析一项大型调查的定性数据来检验这一命题,该调查考察了澳大利亚家庭历史学家的信仰和实践。这些数据支持他们使用历史想象力作为历史解释和意义创造的催化剂,并使用阿什比和李(1987)的历史移情阶段来衡量理解的深度。研究得出结论,对于许多家族史研究人员来说,他们祖先的微观叙事引发了广泛的移情反应,从初级到微妙和复杂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rethinking History
Rethinking History Multiple-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: This acclaimed journal allows historians in a broad range of specialities to experiment with new ways of presenting and interpreting history. Rethinking History challenges the accepted ways of doing history and rethinks the traditional paradigms, providing a unique forum in which practitioners and theorists can debate and expand the boundaries of the discipline.
期刊最新文献
Creating Cromwell: an analysis of the historical novel’s position and potentiality through a study of Hilary Mantel’s Wolf Hall trilogy Between agency and event the book of Job as a Greek tragedy Being alongside: the practice of collaborative public history Just a matter of time: reviewing temporality in Australian historiography Transients, punks and hobos: rethinking the history of train hopping through experimental film
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1