Getting on top of work-email: A systematic review of 25 years of research to understand effective work-email activity

IF 4.9 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology Pub Date : 2023-08-23 DOI:10.1111/joop.12462
Emma Russell, Thomas W. Jackson, Marc Fullman, Petros Chamakiotis
{"title":"Getting on top of work-email: A systematic review of 25 years of research to understand effective work-email activity","authors":"Emma Russell,&nbsp;Thomas W. Jackson,&nbsp;Marc Fullman,&nbsp;Petros Chamakiotis","doi":"10.1111/joop.12462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the last 25 years, work-email activity has been studied across domains and disciplines. Yet, despite the abundance of research available, a comprehensive, unifying framework of how work-email activity positively impacts both well-being and work-performance outcomes has yet to emerge. This is a timely and significant concern; work-email is the most prominent and popular form of work communication but it is still unclear what people need to do to be effective emailers at work. To address this, we undertook a rigorous cross-disciplinary systematic literature review of 62 empirical papers. Using action regulation theory, we developed a multi-action, multi-goal framework and found four ‘super’ actions that consistently predict effectiveness (positive well-being and work-performance outcomes). These actions involve: (i) communicating and adhering to work-email access boundaries; (ii) regularly triaging emails (iii) sending work-relevant email and (iv) being civil and considerate in work-email exchanges. We found that super actions are engaged when workers have the resources to appropriately regulate their activity, and can attend to their self, task and social needs. Our framework synthesizes a broad and disparate research field, providing valuable insights and guiding future research directions. It also offers practical recommendations to organizations and individuals; by understanding and encouraging the adoption of work-email super actions, effective work-email practices can be enhanced.</p>","PeriodicalId":48330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","volume":"97 1","pages":"74-103"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joop.12462","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joop.12462","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the last 25 years, work-email activity has been studied across domains and disciplines. Yet, despite the abundance of research available, a comprehensive, unifying framework of how work-email activity positively impacts both well-being and work-performance outcomes has yet to emerge. This is a timely and significant concern; work-email is the most prominent and popular form of work communication but it is still unclear what people need to do to be effective emailers at work. To address this, we undertook a rigorous cross-disciplinary systematic literature review of 62 empirical papers. Using action regulation theory, we developed a multi-action, multi-goal framework and found four ‘super’ actions that consistently predict effectiveness (positive well-being and work-performance outcomes). These actions involve: (i) communicating and adhering to work-email access boundaries; (ii) regularly triaging emails (iii) sending work-relevant email and (iv) being civil and considerate in work-email exchanges. We found that super actions are engaged when workers have the resources to appropriately regulate their activity, and can attend to their self, task and social needs. Our framework synthesizes a broad and disparate research field, providing valuable insights and guiding future research directions. It also offers practical recommendations to organizations and individuals; by understanding and encouraging the adoption of work-email super actions, effective work-email practices can be enhanced.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
掌控工作-电子邮件:25篇系统综述 多年的研究以了解有效的工作电子邮件活动
最近25 多年来,人们对工作电子邮件活动进行了跨领域和跨学科的研究。然而,尽管有大量的研究,但关于工作电子邮件活动如何对幸福感和工作绩效产生积极影响的全面、统一的框架尚未出现。这是一个及时和重大的关切;工作电子邮件是最突出和最流行的工作交流形式,但人们需要做什么才能在工作中成为有效的电子邮件发送者,目前尚不清楚。为了解决这一问题,我们对62篇实证论文进行了严格的跨学科系统文献综述。使用行动调节理论,我们开发了一个多行动、多目标的框架,并发现了四个“超级”行动,它们可以一致地预测效果(积极的幸福感和工作绩效结果)。这些行动包括:(i)沟通并遵守工作电子邮件访问边界;(ii)定期试用电子邮件(iii)发送与工作相关的电子邮件,以及(iv)在工作电子邮件交流中礼貌周到。我们发现,当工人有资源适当地调节他们的活动,并能够照顾到他们的自我、任务和社会需求时,就会参与超级行动。我们的框架综合了一个广泛而不同的研究领域,提供了有价值的见解并指导了未来的研究方向。它还向各组织和个人提出切实可行的建议;通过理解和鼓励采用工作电子邮件超级行动,可以加强有效的工作电子邮件实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology aims to increase understanding of people and organisations at work including: - industrial, organizational, work, vocational and personnel psychology - behavioural and cognitive aspects of industrial relations - ergonomics and human factors Innovative or interdisciplinary approaches with a psychological emphasis are particularly welcome. So are papers which develop the links between occupational/organisational psychology and other areas of the discipline, such as social and cognitive psychology.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information How much do family‐supportive supervisor behaviours matter? A meta‐analysis based on the ability‐motivation‐opportunity framework Uneventful days? A cautionary tale about the underestimated role of triggering events in employee silence research Presenteeism pressure: The development of a scale and a nomological network Supervisor‐directed anger as a link between work–family conflict and unethical pro‐family behaviours: An attributional perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1