Mode of delivery preferences among multiparous women based on previous birth experience

Barbora Ďuríčeková, Zuzana Škodová, M. Bašková
{"title":"Mode of delivery preferences among multiparous women based on previous birth experience","authors":"Barbora Ďuríčeková, Zuzana Škodová, M. Bašková","doi":"10.15452/cejnm.2021.12.0032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To explore associations between expectations regarding birth (including mode of delivery) and experience of the previous birth among multiparous women. Design: A cross-sectional study. Methods: A specially designed questionnaire was used to explore subjective perceptions of previous births. We also used the standardized questionnaire of birth-related fear (W-DEQ). Descriptive statistics and the ANOVA test, chi-square test, and Student t-test were used. The research group consisted of 111 pregnant women with a mean age of 31 (± 3.58) years. Results: Most women preferred cesarean section as a mode of delivery (63.1%). Women who preferred cesarean section less frequently considered experiencing every stage of the birth to be an advantage of vaginal delivery. They more often perceived pelvic floor damage as a disadvantage of vaginal delivery (p = 0.000), and shorter delivery time as an advantage of cesarean section (p = 0.048). Significant fear of childbirth was confirmed in 25.2% of respondents. We found statistical significance between cesarean section preference and increased fear of childbirth (p = 0.05). Conclusion: Focusing on the impact of childbirth on the psychological state of a woman, should be one of the priorities of midwives to reduce fear of subsequent labor and prevent serious mental health","PeriodicalId":38129,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Nursing and Midwifery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Journal of Nursing and Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15452/cejnm.2021.12.0032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim: To explore associations between expectations regarding birth (including mode of delivery) and experience of the previous birth among multiparous women. Design: A cross-sectional study. Methods: A specially designed questionnaire was used to explore subjective perceptions of previous births. We also used the standardized questionnaire of birth-related fear (W-DEQ). Descriptive statistics and the ANOVA test, chi-square test, and Student t-test were used. The research group consisted of 111 pregnant women with a mean age of 31 (± 3.58) years. Results: Most women preferred cesarean section as a mode of delivery (63.1%). Women who preferred cesarean section less frequently considered experiencing every stage of the birth to be an advantage of vaginal delivery. They more often perceived pelvic floor damage as a disadvantage of vaginal delivery (p = 0.000), and shorter delivery time as an advantage of cesarean section (p = 0.048). Significant fear of childbirth was confirmed in 25.2% of respondents. We found statistical significance between cesarean section preference and increased fear of childbirth (p = 0.05). Conclusion: Focusing on the impact of childbirth on the psychological state of a woman, should be one of the priorities of midwives to reduce fear of subsequent labor and prevent serious mental health
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于以往分娩经验的多产妇女的分娩方式偏好
目的:探讨经产妇对分娩的期望(包括分娩方式)和既往分娩经历之间的关系。设计:横断面研究。方法:采用专门设计的问卷调查方法,探讨对既往分娩的主观认知。我们还使用了出生相关恐惧的标准化问卷(W-DEQ)。使用描述性统计和方差分析检验、卡方检验和Student t检验。研究组由111名孕妇组成,平均年龄31(±3.58)岁。结果:大多数女性更喜欢剖宫产作为一种分娩方式(63.1%)。那些不太经常选择剖宫产的女性认为经历分娩的每个阶段是阴道分娩的优势。他们更经常将盆底损伤视为阴道分娩的不利因素(p=0.000),而将分娩时间缩短视为剖宫产的有利因素(p=0.048)。25.2%的受访者证实了对分娩的严重恐惧。结论:关注分娩对女性心理状态的影响,应成为助产士减少对后续分娩的恐惧和预防严重心理健康的首要任务之一
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
The process of childbirth as a factor influencing women's satisfaction Enhancing literature search transparency and quality in systematic reviews Stress factors experienced by nursing and midwifery students Autonomy in nursing: a narrative review of instruments and their measurement properties Perceived health-related quality of life and selected characteristics of inpatients with rheumatic diseases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1