Automated system of court enforcement proceedings as element of information provision for compulsory enforcement of decisions

N. Sergiienko, Serhii V. Suslin, Vira Pyrohovska, Volodymyr Serha, Kotovych Ihor
{"title":"Automated system of court enforcement proceedings as element of information provision for compulsory enforcement of decisions","authors":"N. Sergiienko, Serhii V. Suslin, Vira Pyrohovska, Volodymyr Serha, Kotovych Ihor","doi":"10.46398/cuestpol.4177.36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the article was to suggest ways to improve the legislation regulating the scope of operation of the automated system of judicial enforcement proceedings, in order to increase the effectiveness of enforced execution of decisions while respecting human rights. The methodology of the article was based on the application of the following methods of scientific cognition: analytical, deductive, hermeneutic, comparative and synthesis. In addition, the authors analyze the legal regulation of the operation of the automated system of execution of court judgments, as an element of information provision for the forced execution of resolutions and, at the same time, have revealed the gaps in its legal regulation and, consequently, have suggested the ways to eliminate them. It was definitely established that there was no need to amend the legislation concerning the distribution of enforcement documents among private enforcement officers within their districts of jurisdiction. In the conclusions it was offered to improve certain provisions of the Ukrainian legislation regulating the provision of information on compulsory enforcement of decisions, in particular, to give the prosecutor access to information on judicial enforcement proceedings on an equal footing with the parties.","PeriodicalId":40854,"journal":{"name":"Cuestiones Politicas","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuestiones Politicas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4177.36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the article was to suggest ways to improve the legislation regulating the scope of operation of the automated system of judicial enforcement proceedings, in order to increase the effectiveness of enforced execution of decisions while respecting human rights. The methodology of the article was based on the application of the following methods of scientific cognition: analytical, deductive, hermeneutic, comparative and synthesis. In addition, the authors analyze the legal regulation of the operation of the automated system of execution of court judgments, as an element of information provision for the forced execution of resolutions and, at the same time, have revealed the gaps in its legal regulation and, consequently, have suggested the ways to eliminate them. It was definitely established that there was no need to amend the legislation concerning the distribution of enforcement documents among private enforcement officers within their districts of jurisdiction. In the conclusions it was offered to improve certain provisions of the Ukrainian legislation regulating the provision of information on compulsory enforcement of decisions, in particular, to give the prosecutor access to information on judicial enforcement proceedings on an equal footing with the parties.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法院强制执行程序自动化系统作为强制执行判决的信息提供要素
该条的目的是建议如何改进规范司法执行程序自动化系统运作范围的立法,以便在尊重人权的同时提高强制执行决定的效力。本文的方法论是基于以下科学认知方法的应用:分析法、演绎法、解释学、比较法和综合法。此外,作者还分析了法院判决执行自动化系统运作的法律法规,作为强制执行决议的信息提供要素,同时揭示了其法律法规中的漏洞,并提出了消除这些漏洞的方法。已经明确确定,没有必要修改有关在其管辖区内私人执法人员之间分配执法文件的立法。结论中提出改进乌克兰立法中关于提供关于强制执行决定的信息的某些规定,特别是让检察官在与当事方平等的基础上获得关于司法执行程序的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cuestiones Politicas
Cuestiones Politicas POLITICAL SCIENCE-
自引率
42.90%
发文量
154
期刊最新文献
Financial responsibility of the state: a comparative analysis of the European countries’ approaches in peacetime and wartime The system of political education as an institute for the professionalization of politics Recognition and normative reconstruction as a theory of justice in Axel Honneth Legislative Support Standards in the European Union in the Field of Building a System of Local Self-Government Features of the Functioning of the Legal System in the Context of Digitalization Processes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1