Processing Mad Men: Media Studies, Legitimation, and Archival Description

IF 0.6 4区 管理学 Q1 HISTORY Information & Culture Pub Date : 2021-06-24 DOI:10.7560/IC56202
K. Cronin
{"title":"Processing Mad Men: Media Studies, Legitimation, and Archival Description","authors":"K. Cronin","doi":"10.7560/IC56202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Media scholars and historians are well aware of major gaps within the archival record, gaps that have fundamentally shaped the theories and methodologies of media studies as a discipline. However, much of the valuable media studies research that has been done to interrogate ideological work within \"the archive\" is actually research into the politics of one specific archival process: acquisition. This article focuses instead on the process of archival description. Comparing the rhetorical strategies present in the press surrounding the Harry Ransom Center's (HRC) acquisition of Matthew Weiner's Mad Men materials with the HRC finding aid's description of the collection itself, this article demonstrates a historiographical imperative for media scholars to cultivate basic archival literacies drawn from the archival disciplines themselves. I argue that by better valuing the intellectual labor of archivists, media scholars will be well-positioned to make use of the considerable archival record that does remain.","PeriodicalId":42337,"journal":{"name":"Information & Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information & Culture","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7560/IC56202","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

abstract:Media scholars and historians are well aware of major gaps within the archival record, gaps that have fundamentally shaped the theories and methodologies of media studies as a discipline. However, much of the valuable media studies research that has been done to interrogate ideological work within "the archive" is actually research into the politics of one specific archival process: acquisition. This article focuses instead on the process of archival description. Comparing the rhetorical strategies present in the press surrounding the Harry Ransom Center's (HRC) acquisition of Matthew Weiner's Mad Men materials with the HRC finding aid's description of the collection itself, this article demonstrates a historiographical imperative for media scholars to cultivate basic archival literacies drawn from the archival disciplines themselves. I argue that by better valuing the intellectual labor of archivists, media scholars will be well-positioned to make use of the considerable archival record that does remain.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
处理广告狂人:媒体研究、合法化和档案描述
摘要:媒体学者和历史学家非常清楚档案记录中的主要空白,这些空白从根本上塑造了媒体研究作为一门学科的理论和方法。然而,为质疑“档案”中的意识形态工作而进行的许多有价值的媒体研究实际上是对一个特定档案过程的政治研究:获取。本文转而关注档案描述的过程。本文将哈里·兰索姆中心(HRC)收购马修·韦纳(Matthew Weiner)的《广告狂人》(Mad Men)材料的媒体修辞策略与HRC调查援助机构对藏品本身的描述进行了比较,表明媒体学者培养从档案学科中提取的基本档案文献在历史上是必要的。我认为,通过更好地重视档案工作者的智力劳动,媒体学者将能够很好地利用现有的大量档案记录。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Literary versus Nonliterary People: Rhetorical Strategies of Derogation in the Sensitivity Reading Debate Dynamics of Gender Bias within Computer Science How Does Short Video Viewing Influence Young Children’s Everyday Language Practices? A Case Study of China Embodiment, Endorsement, and Policy: Considerations for Intellectual Freedom in the Library Turtles, Tablets, and Boxes: Computer Technology and Education in the 1970s
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1