The Psychometric properties of dementia knowledge scales: A Systematic Review

Phan Thi Thu-Huong
{"title":"The Psychometric properties of dementia knowledge scales: A Systematic Review","authors":"Phan Thi Thu-Huong","doi":"10.5176/2345-7198_4.1.119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dementia prevalence is accelerating internationally commensurate with population aging causing suffering from families as well as society burden because it is generally met with misunderstanding, fear, and stigma. Therefore, it is hoped that efforts to increase awareness, reduce stigma, and clarify misunderstandings of the illness can enable early detection of dementia. There are many different tests that were used to assess dementia knowledge however the use of inferior methods could account for some inconsistent findings related to dementia knowledge. It is important to define robustness of the psychometric properties of dementia knowledge tools. The aim of this study is to provide a systematic overview of what is known from previous research on assessing the reliability and validity of psychometric properties of dementia knowledge scales. A systematic literature search (2009 2017) was performed using the electronic databases PubMed, Web of science and Google scholar in English and Vietnamese. References and citations were tracked to identify additional, relevant studies basing on study eligibility criteria and excluded criteria. Five original studies were recruited from 562 studies in the selected databases for analyzing of the measurement properties of dementia knowledge scales. Quality judgment criteria were formulated and used to evaluate the psychometric aspects of the scales. Results: This systematic review revealed 4 dementia knowledge scales (ADKS, DKAS, DK-20, DKAT2) in 5 selected researches. Our findings (based on quality judgment criteria relating to validity, reliability, feasibility) demonstrate that ADKS, DKAS show good psychometric qualities, ranging from 15-17 score of psychometric qualities of dementia knowledge scale. The last two (DK-20 and DKAT2) scored 11 and 13 points of a maximum quality score of 20, respectively, so their psychometric quality can be regarded as moderate. Therefore, these tools await confirmation of various aspects of their psychometric properties. Conclusion: Based on the psychometric qualities, we concluded that ADKS and DKAS are the appropriate scales currently available. Further research should focus on improving these scales by further testing their validity, reliability, and utility. Keywords-component: Knowledge; Scale; dementia; Alzheimer; reliability; validity. Special Issue : GSTF Journal of Nursing and Health Care (JNHC) Vol.4 No.1, May-2019 DOI: 10.5176/2345-7198_4.1.119 ©The Author(s) 2019. This article is published with open access by the GSTF","PeriodicalId":91870,"journal":{"name":"GSTF journal of nursing and health care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GSTF journal of nursing and health care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5176/2345-7198_4.1.119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Dementia prevalence is accelerating internationally commensurate with population aging causing suffering from families as well as society burden because it is generally met with misunderstanding, fear, and stigma. Therefore, it is hoped that efforts to increase awareness, reduce stigma, and clarify misunderstandings of the illness can enable early detection of dementia. There are many different tests that were used to assess dementia knowledge however the use of inferior methods could account for some inconsistent findings related to dementia knowledge. It is important to define robustness of the psychometric properties of dementia knowledge tools. The aim of this study is to provide a systematic overview of what is known from previous research on assessing the reliability and validity of psychometric properties of dementia knowledge scales. A systematic literature search (2009 2017) was performed using the electronic databases PubMed, Web of science and Google scholar in English and Vietnamese. References and citations were tracked to identify additional, relevant studies basing on study eligibility criteria and excluded criteria. Five original studies were recruited from 562 studies in the selected databases for analyzing of the measurement properties of dementia knowledge scales. Quality judgment criteria were formulated and used to evaluate the psychometric aspects of the scales. Results: This systematic review revealed 4 dementia knowledge scales (ADKS, DKAS, DK-20, DKAT2) in 5 selected researches. Our findings (based on quality judgment criteria relating to validity, reliability, feasibility) demonstrate that ADKS, DKAS show good psychometric qualities, ranging from 15-17 score of psychometric qualities of dementia knowledge scale. The last two (DK-20 and DKAT2) scored 11 and 13 points of a maximum quality score of 20, respectively, so their psychometric quality can be regarded as moderate. Therefore, these tools await confirmation of various aspects of their psychometric properties. Conclusion: Based on the psychometric qualities, we concluded that ADKS and DKAS are the appropriate scales currently available. Further research should focus on improving these scales by further testing their validity, reliability, and utility. Keywords-component: Knowledge; Scale; dementia; Alzheimer; reliability; validity. Special Issue : GSTF Journal of Nursing and Health Care (JNHC) Vol.4 No.1, May-2019 DOI: 10.5176/2345-7198_4.1.119 ©The Author(s) 2019. This article is published with open access by the GSTF
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
痴呆症知识量表的心理测量特性:系统综述
痴呆症在国际上的流行率正在加速,这与人口老龄化相称,造成家庭和社会负担的痛苦,因为它通常会遇到误解、恐惧和耻辱。因此,希望通过努力提高人们的认识,减少耻辱感,澄清对这种疾病的误解,能够早期发现痴呆症。有许多不同的测试用于评估痴呆症知识,但使用较差的方法可能会导致与痴呆症知识相关的一些不一致的结果。定义痴呆症知识工具的心理测量特性的稳健性是很重要的。本研究的目的是系统地概述先前关于评估痴呆症知识量表心理测量特性的可靠性和有效性的研究。使用电子数据库PubMed、Web of science和谷歌学者的英语和越南语进行了系统的文献检索(20092017)。根据研究资格标准和排除标准,追踪参考文献和引文,以确定其他相关研究。从选定数据库中的562项研究中招募了5项原始研究,用于分析痴呆症知识量表的测量特性。制定了质量判断标准,并用于评估量表的心理测量方面。结果:本系统综述在5项选定的研究中揭示了4种痴呆知识量表(ADKS、DKAS、DK-20、DKAT2)。我们的研究结果(基于与有效性、可靠性和可行性相关的质量判断标准)表明,ADKS、DKAS表现出良好的心理测量质量,痴呆知识量表的心理测量品质得分在15-17分之间。最后两个(DK-20和DKAT2)分别得了11分和13分,最高质量分数为20,因此他们的心理测量质量可以被视为中等。因此,这些工具等待着对其心理测量特性的各个方面的确认。结论:根据心理测量的特点,我们得出结论,ADKS和DKAS是目前可用的合适量表。进一步的研究应侧重于通过进一步测试其有效性、可靠性和实用性来改进这些量表。关键词组成部分:知识;规模痴呆;阿尔茨海默病;可靠性有效性特刊:GSTF《护理与健康护理杂志》(JNHC)第4卷第1期,2019年5月DOI:10.5176/2345-71988_4.1.119©作者2019。本文由GSTF以开放访问的方式发布
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Is Surrogacy Morally Acceptable in Hong Kong? Coping Behaviors and Collaboration among Staff of Multiple Occupation Classifications during Norovirus Health-related quality of life and psychological distress in implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients with and without heart failure Management of Volunteer Activities Among Elderly Persons Compassion Fatigue among Healthcare Personnel in Acute Care Contexts: An Integrative Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1