The President’s Influence on the Formation of Lithuanian Foreign Policy: A Shift of the Power Center During Grybauskaitė’s Term

Q4 Social Sciences Politologija Pub Date : 2019-07-17 DOI:10.15388/POLIT.2019.94.1
Tomas Janeliūnas
{"title":"The President’s Influence on the Formation of Lithuanian Foreign Policy: A Shift of the Power Center During Grybauskaitė’s Term","authors":"Tomas Janeliūnas","doi":"10.15388/POLIT.2019.94.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article raises the question of what role does the presidential institution hold in the Lithuanian foreign policy formation mechanism and how a particular actor (president) can change their powers in foreign policy without going beyond the functions formally defined in the Constitution. The period of President Grybauskaitė’s term and her efforts as an actor to define her role in shaping Lithuanian foreign policy are analyzed. This is assessed in the context of the activities and behavior of former Lithuanian presidents and in the context of relations with other institutions involved in foreign policy making – the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) and the Seimas in particular. This article analyzes the relationship between the actor (Grybauskaitė) and the already established structure of domestic foreign policy formation and the ability of the actor to change this structure. The analysis suggests that it is precisely because of the choices made by Grybauskaite during 2009–2019 that a relationship between the structures of foreign policy making in Lithuania has changed considerably, and that the center of power of foreign policy formation has shifted to the presidency.","PeriodicalId":35151,"journal":{"name":"Politologija","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politologija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/POLIT.2019.94.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article raises the question of what role does the presidential institution hold in the Lithuanian foreign policy formation mechanism and how a particular actor (president) can change their powers in foreign policy without going beyond the functions formally defined in the Constitution. The period of President Grybauskaitė’s term and her efforts as an actor to define her role in shaping Lithuanian foreign policy are analyzed. This is assessed in the context of the activities and behavior of former Lithuanian presidents and in the context of relations with other institutions involved in foreign policy making – the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) and the Seimas in particular. This article analyzes the relationship between the actor (Grybauskaitė) and the already established structure of domestic foreign policy formation and the ability of the actor to change this structure. The analysis suggests that it is precisely because of the choices made by Grybauskaite during 2009–2019 that a relationship between the structures of foreign policy making in Lithuania has changed considerably, and that the center of power of foreign policy formation has shifted to the presidency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
总统对立陶宛外交政策形成的影响:格里包斯凯特任期内权力中心的转变
这篇文章提出了一个问题,即总统机构在立陶宛外交政策形成机制中扮演什么角色,以及特定行为者(总统)如何在不超出宪法正式规定的职能的情况下改变其外交政策权力。分析了格里包斯凯特总统的任期,以及她作为一名行动者为确定自己在塑造立陶宛外交政策中的作用所做的努力。这是在立陶宛前总统的活动和行为背景下,以及在与其他参与外交政策制定的机构——特别是外交部和议会——的关系背景下进行评估的。本文分析了行为者(Grybauskaitë)与国内外交政策形成的既定结构之间的关系,以及行为者改变这种结构的能力。分析表明,正是由于格里包斯凯特在2009-2019年期间做出的选择,立陶宛外交政策制定结构之间的关系发生了重大变化,外交政策制定的权力中心已转移到总统身上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Politologija
Politologija Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Tarp sėkmės ir katastrofos: dvi perspektyvos į perėjimo procesą postkomunistinėse valstybėse Challenging Political Representation in the Era of Big Data Nuo akmens iki sėklos: objektai ir kontratminties aktyvizmas Brazilijoje antikolonijinio demonumentalizavimo sąlygomis Aukštų pareigūnų skyrimas pusiau prezidentiniame modelyje: Lietuvos atvejis* The Theoretical Model of Smart Governance in Local Government
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1