How to promote the environmental sustainability of shared e-scooters: A life-cycle analysis based on a case study from Lisbon, Portugal,

IF 2.7 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Journal of Urban Mobility Pub Date : 2022-12-29 DOI:10.1016/j.urbmob.2022.100044
Ana Filipa Reis , Patrícia Baptista , Filipe Moura
{"title":"How to promote the environmental sustainability of shared e-scooters: A life-cycle analysis based on a case study from Lisbon, Portugal,","authors":"Ana Filipa Reis ,&nbsp;Patrícia Baptista ,&nbsp;Filipe Moura","doi":"10.1016/j.urbmob.2022.100044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Electric scooter sharing systems have emerged as an innovative short distance transport mode. Since these systems are dockless, they require collection for maintenance and charging, as well as rebalancing operations citywide, justifying the need for an integrated analysis. This work performs a Life Cycle Analysis to assess the environmental impacts of all stages of a shared e-scooter, based on the use case of Lisbon, Portugal. Results indicate that an e-scooter emits 804 to 1679 g  <span><math><mrow><mi>C</mi><msub><mi>O</mi><mrow><mn>2</mn><mi>e</mi><mi>q</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span>/km, which is justified by its low use rates and reduced life span. Its production accounts for more than 70% of impacts, collection and distribution processes for 6% and vehicle use corresponds to 17%. Increasing the shared e-scooter life expectancy reduces environmental impacts by 26 to 47%, while increasing the kilometers per day reduces the impacts between 50% to 80%. Also, a less frequent collection of e-scooters would improve the results between 7 and 42%. These results enabled defining specific strategies and policies to guarantee a more sustainable deployment and operation of shared e-scooter systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100852,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Mobility","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100044"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Mobility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667091722000322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Electric scooter sharing systems have emerged as an innovative short distance transport mode. Since these systems are dockless, they require collection for maintenance and charging, as well as rebalancing operations citywide, justifying the need for an integrated analysis. This work performs a Life Cycle Analysis to assess the environmental impacts of all stages of a shared e-scooter, based on the use case of Lisbon, Portugal. Results indicate that an e-scooter emits 804 to 1679 g  CO2eq/km, which is justified by its low use rates and reduced life span. Its production accounts for more than 70% of impacts, collection and distribution processes for 6% and vehicle use corresponds to 17%. Increasing the shared e-scooter life expectancy reduces environmental impacts by 26 to 47%, while increasing the kilometers per day reduces the impacts between 50% to 80%. Also, a less frequent collection of e-scooters would improve the results between 7 and 42%. These results enabled defining specific strategies and policies to guarantee a more sustainable deployment and operation of shared e-scooter systems.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如何促进共享电动滑板车的环境可持续性:基于葡萄牙里斯本案例的生命周期分析
电动滑板车共享系统已经成为一种创新的短途交通方式。由于这些系统是无码头的,它们需要收集以进行维护和收费,并在全市范围内重新平衡运营,从而证明需要进行综合分析。这项工作基于葡萄牙里斯本的使用案例进行了生命周期分析,以评估共享电动踏板车所有阶段的环境影响。结果表明,电动踏板车每公里排放804至1679克二氧化碳,这是由于其使用率低和寿命缩短。其生产占影响的70%以上,收集和分配过程占6%,车辆使用占17%。增加共享电动踏板车的预期寿命将减少26%至47%的环境影响,而增加每天的公里数将减少50%至80%的影响。此外,不太频繁地收集电子cooter将使结果提高7%至42%。这些结果使我们能够确定具体的战略和政策,以确保共享电动踏板车系统的更可持续的部署和运营。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contrasting Stakeholders’ Perspectives on the First Full-Year School Street Initiatives in Ontario, Canada Just around the corner: Accessibility by proximity in the 15-minute city Diminishing returns of additional active travel infrastructure: Evaluating Barcelona's decade of sustainable transportation progress Effects of different mobility concepts in new residential areas Enhancing last mile connectivity using shared mobility: A stated preference survey of business park commuters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1