Reliability and validity of an indicator system for assessing the quality of ophthalmic nursing

Frontiers of Nursing Pub Date : 2016-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cnre.2016.11.004

Jing-Hua Shi , Lu Liu , Ya-Qin Li

{"title":"Reliability and validity of an indicator system for assessing the quality of ophthalmic nursing","authors":"Jing-Hua Shi , Lu Liu , Ya-Qin Li","doi":"10.1016/j.cnre.2016.11.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of an indicator system for assessing the quality of ophthalmic nursing.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A questionnaire-based study was performed for 218 individuals in clinical nursing management using this indicator system. The resulting data were compiled and analyzed using Excel 2003 and SPSS 13.0, and tests of reliability and validity were conducted.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The indicator system yielded an overall Cronbach's ɑ value of 0.948, a test-retest reliability of 0.793, 3-dimensional Cronbach's ɑ values of 0.870–0.930, and a content validity of 0.92. Exploratory factor analysis was then performed to extract three common factors, which generated a cumulative contribution rate of 54.04%. The load range of each factor was 0.43–0.83.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The indicator system for evaluating the quality of ophthalmic nursing has favorable reliability and validity, which means that it is a suitable clinical tool for assessing the quality of ophthalmic nursing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":57172,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of Nursing","volume":"3 4","pages":"Pages 158-161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cnre.2016.11.004","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095771816300925","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of an indicator system for assessing the quality of ophthalmic nursing.

Methods

A questionnaire-based study was performed for 218 individuals in clinical nursing management using this indicator system. The resulting data were compiled and analyzed using Excel 2003 and SPSS 13.0, and tests of reliability and validity were conducted.

Results

The indicator system yielded an overall Cronbach's ɑ value of 0.948, a test-retest reliability of 0.793, 3-dimensional Cronbach's ɑ values of 0.870–0.930, and a content validity of 0.92. Exploratory factor analysis was then performed to extract three common factors, which generated a cumulative contribution rate of 54.04%. The load range of each factor was 0.43–0.83.

Conclusions

The indicator system for evaluating the quality of ophthalmic nursing has favorable reliability and validity, which means that it is a suitable clinical tool for assessing the quality of ophthalmic nursing.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

眼科护理质量评价指标体系的信度和效度

目的探讨眼科护理质量评价指标体系的信度和效度。方法采用该指标体系对218名临床护理管理人员进行问卷调查。采用Excel 2003和SPSS 13.0对所得数据进行整理和分析，并进行信度和效度检验。结果该指标体系的总体Cronbach’s系数为0.948，重测信度为0.793，三维Cronbach’s系数为0.870 ~ 0.930，内容效度为0.92。然后进行探索性因子分析，提取3个共同因子，累积贡献率为54.04%。各因子的负荷范围为0.43 ~ 0.83。结论所建立的眼科护理质量评价指标体系具有良好的信度和效度，可作为眼科护理质量评价的临床工具。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Frontiers of Nursing

自引率

0.00%

发文量

353