Assessing Coping with Stress Self-Efficacy: English Validation of the CSSES

Débora Godoy-Izquierdo PhD , Helena Colodro Sola Lyc , Juan F. Godoy García PhD
{"title":"Assessing Coping with Stress Self-Efficacy: English Validation of the CSSES","authors":"Débora Godoy-Izquierdo PhD ,&nbsp;Helena Colodro Sola Lyc ,&nbsp;Juan F. Godoy García PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ehrm.2011.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Specific self-efficacy for coping with stress refers to the judgments regarding the personal resources aimed at effectively facing taxing conditions. Coping self-efficacy is essential in stress-related issues as well as for increasing coping skills.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To cross-validate the psychometric properties of the Coping with Stress Self-Efficacy Scale (CSSES) among English speakers in order to complement previous findings with the original Spanish version.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A convenience, population-based sample of adult women and men from the UK answered the CSSES and another questionnaire assessing self-efficacy beliefs for the use of specific strategies for coping with stress.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The CSSES showed adequate reliability and factorial and concurrent validity. Confirmatory factor analysis corroborates those results. A few weaknesses were detected and some solutions are proposed.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Given that the CSSES is brief and easy to use as well as adequate psychometrically, it seems to be an appropriate instrument for evaluating coping with stress self-efficacy in both research and clinical contexts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":88882,"journal":{"name":"Health outcomes research in medicine","volume":"2 2","pages":"Pages e105-e118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ehrm.2011.06.001","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health outcomes research in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877131911000139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background

Specific self-efficacy for coping with stress refers to the judgments regarding the personal resources aimed at effectively facing taxing conditions. Coping self-efficacy is essential in stress-related issues as well as for increasing coping skills.

Objective

To cross-validate the psychometric properties of the Coping with Stress Self-Efficacy Scale (CSSES) among English speakers in order to complement previous findings with the original Spanish version.

Methods

A convenience, population-based sample of adult women and men from the UK answered the CSSES and another questionnaire assessing self-efficacy beliefs for the use of specific strategies for coping with stress.

Results

The CSSES showed adequate reliability and factorial and concurrent validity. Confirmatory factor analysis corroborates those results. A few weaknesses were detected and some solutions are proposed.

Conclusions

Given that the CSSES is brief and easy to use as well as adequate psychometrically, it seems to be an appropriate instrument for evaluating coping with stress self-efficacy in both research and clinical contexts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应对压力自我效能的评估:csss的英语验证
背景应对压力的特定自我效能是指针对个人资源的判断,目的是有效地面对压力环境。应对自我效能在压力相关问题中以及提高应对技能中都是必不可少的。目的对英语人群应对压力自我效能感量表(cses)的心理测量特征进行交叉验证,以期与西班牙语原版量表相补充。方法为了方便起见,对英国成年男女进行人群抽样,分别回答了cses和另一份评估自我效能感信念的问卷,以评估他们在应对压力时使用的具体策略。结果本量表具有良好的信度、析因效度和并发效度。验证性因子分析证实了这些结果。在此基础上,提出了一些解决方案。结论cses量表具有简洁、易于使用、心理计量学指标完备的特点,在研究和临床中都是一种适合于应激自我效能评价的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
WITHDRAWN: Utility and Work Productivity Data for Economic Evaluation of Breast Cancer Therapies in the Netherlands and Sweden Health Care Utilization and Costs among Medicaid-enrolled Patients with Schizophrenia Experiencing Multiple Psychiatric Relapses Outcomes-based Risk-sharing Schemes: Is There a Potential Role in the Asia-Pacific Markets? Comparative Effectiveness of On-Pump versus Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Among Elderly Patients: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Long-term Adherence to Hormone Therapy in Medicaid-enrolled Women with Breast Cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1