Comparison of serum fractionation methods by data independent label-free proteomics

Q4 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology EuPA Open Proteomics Pub Date : 2015-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.euprot.2015.07.009
D. Baiwir , G. Mazzucchelli , N. Smargiasso , F. Quesada-Calvo , E. De Pauw , M. Malaise , E. Louis , M.-A. Meuwis
{"title":"Comparison of serum fractionation methods by data independent label-free proteomics","authors":"D. Baiwir ,&nbsp;G. Mazzucchelli ,&nbsp;N. Smargiasso ,&nbsp;F. Quesada-Calvo ,&nbsp;E. De Pauw ,&nbsp;M. Malaise ,&nbsp;E. Louis ,&nbsp;M.-A. Meuwis","doi":"10.1016/j.euprot.2015.07.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Off-line sample prefractionations applied prior to biomarker discovery proteomics are options to enable more protein identifications and detect low-abundance proteins. This work compared five commercial methods efficiency to raw serum analysis using label-free proteomics. The variability of the protein quantities determined for each process was similar to the unprefractionated serum. A 49% increase in protein identifications and 12.2% of reliable quantification were obtained. A 61 times lower limit of protein quantitation was reached compared to protein concentrations observed in raw serum. The concentrations of detected proteins were confronted to estimated reference values.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38260,"journal":{"name":"EuPA Open Proteomics","volume":"9 ","pages":"Pages 14-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.euprot.2015.07.009","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EuPA Open Proteomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212968515300118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Off-line sample prefractionations applied prior to biomarker discovery proteomics are options to enable more protein identifications and detect low-abundance proteins. This work compared five commercial methods efficiency to raw serum analysis using label-free proteomics. The variability of the protein quantities determined for each process was similar to the unprefractionated serum. A 49% increase in protein identifications and 12.2% of reliable quantification were obtained. A 61 times lower limit of protein quantitation was reached compared to protein concentrations observed in raw serum. The concentrations of detected proteins were confronted to estimated reference values.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数据独立的无标记蛋白质组学血清分离方法的比较
在生物标志物发现之前进行离线样品预分离,蛋白质组学是实现更多蛋白质鉴定和检测低丰度蛋白质的选择。这项工作比较了五种商业方法与使用无标记蛋白质组学的原始血清分析的效率。每种工艺测定的蛋白质量的可变性与未预分离的血清相似。获得了49%的蛋白质鉴定和12.2%的可靠定量。与原血清中观察到的蛋白质浓度相比,达到了蛋白质定量下限的61倍。检测到的蛋白质浓度与估计的参考值相符。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
EuPA Open Proteomics
EuPA Open Proteomics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
期刊最新文献
Proceedings of the EuBIC-MS 2020 Developers’ Meeting Editorial: The next generation in (EuPA Open) Proteomics Aims & scope Proceedings of the EuBIC Winter School 2019 Introducing the YPIC challenge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1