Associations between daily sitting time and the combinations of lifestyle risk factors in men

Pub Date : 2012-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jomh.2012.02.003
S. Zwolinsky BSc , A. Pringle PhD , A. Daly-Smith MSc , J. McKenna PhD , S. Robertson PhD , A. White PhD
{"title":"Associations between daily sitting time and the combinations of lifestyle risk factors in men","authors":"S. Zwolinsky BSc ,&nbsp;A. Pringle PhD ,&nbsp;A. Daly-Smith MSc ,&nbsp;J. McKenna PhD ,&nbsp;S. Robertson PhD ,&nbsp;A. White PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jomh.2012.02.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Understanding the reciprocal role that multiple problematic behaviours play in men's health is important for intervention delivery and for reducing the healthcare burden. Data regarding the concurrence of problematic health behaviours is currently limited but offers insights into risk profiles, and should now include total time spent sitting/day.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Self-reported data on lifestyle health behaviours was collected from 232 men aged ≥18 years who engaged in a men's health promotion programme delivered by 16 English Premier League Clubs.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Men at risk due to high sitting display multiple concurrent lifestyle risk factors, 88.6% displayed at least two ancillary risk factors and were three times more likely to report ≥2 lifestyle risk factors (OR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->3.13, 95% confidence interval (CI)<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.52–6.42) than those with low sitting risk. Significant differences in the mean number of risk factors reported between those participants in the higher risk (2.43<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.90) and lower risk (2.13<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.96) sitting categories were also found (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.015).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Hard-to-reach men displayed multiple problematic concurrent behaviours, strongly linked to total sitting time.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jomh.2012.02.003","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875686712000279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Background

Understanding the reciprocal role that multiple problematic behaviours play in men's health is important for intervention delivery and for reducing the healthcare burden. Data regarding the concurrence of problematic health behaviours is currently limited but offers insights into risk profiles, and should now include total time spent sitting/day.

Methods

Self-reported data on lifestyle health behaviours was collected from 232 men aged ≥18 years who engaged in a men's health promotion programme delivered by 16 English Premier League Clubs.

Results

Men at risk due to high sitting display multiple concurrent lifestyle risk factors, 88.6% displayed at least two ancillary risk factors and were three times more likely to report ≥2 lifestyle risk factors (OR = 3.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.52–6.42) than those with low sitting risk. Significant differences in the mean number of risk factors reported between those participants in the higher risk (2.43 ± 0.90) and lower risk (2.13 ± 0.96) sitting categories were also found (P = 0.015).

Conclusions

Hard-to-reach men displayed multiple problematic concurrent behaviours, strongly linked to total sitting time.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
男性日常坐着时间与生活方式风险因素组合之间的关系
背景:了解多种问题行为在男性健康中的相互作用,对于提供干预措施和减轻医疗负担非常重要。关于问题健康行为同时发生的数据目前有限,但提供了对风险概况的见解,现在应该包括每天坐着的总时间。方法收集16家英超俱乐部开展的男性健康促进项目中232名年龄≥18岁的男性的生活方式健康行为自述数据。结果高坐风险人群同时存在多种生活方式危险因素,88.6%的人至少存在两种辅助危险因素,报告≥2种生活方式危险因素的可能性是低坐风险人群的3倍(OR = 3.13, 95%可信区间(CI) = 1.52 ~ 6.42)。高危险坐姿组(2.43±0.90)和低危险坐姿组(2.13±0.96)报告的危险因素的平均数目也有显著差异(P = 0.015)。结论:难以接触的男性表现出多种有问题的同时行为,与总坐着时间密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1