Hands and eyes, sight and touch: appraising the senses in Anglo-Saxon England

Katherine O'Brien O'Keeffe
{"title":"Hands and eyes, sight and touch: appraising the senses in Anglo-Saxon England","authors":"Katherine O'Brien O'Keeffe","doi":"10.1017/S0263675100080248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The archives of knowledge through which Anglo-Saxons understood the senses ranged from vernacular to patristic. Quotidian understanding of the senses treated them as functions of their corresponding bodily organs, as the injury tariffs of Æthelberht and Alfred illustrate. Old English learned prose catalogues the senses from sight to touch with an order that bespeaks a set of understandings about bodies, materiality, souls and salvation. There the differing appraisals of sight and its lesser sibling, touch, track their perceived mediations between the world and the soul. The Old English Boethius, Wærferth's Dialogues and a range of Ælfric's writings illustrate understandings of these senses’ mediation between the material and the immaterial, the corporeal and the incorporeal. The meaning of Wulfstan's legislation on friðlice steora must thus be sought in a crossing of archives of appraisals – the legal valuation of body parts and the patristic understanding of senses as channels between the flesh and the spirit.","PeriodicalId":80459,"journal":{"name":"Anglo-Saxon England","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0263675100080248","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anglo-Saxon England","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0263675100080248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract The archives of knowledge through which Anglo-Saxons understood the senses ranged from vernacular to patristic. Quotidian understanding of the senses treated them as functions of their corresponding bodily organs, as the injury tariffs of Æthelberht and Alfred illustrate. Old English learned prose catalogues the senses from sight to touch with an order that bespeaks a set of understandings about bodies, materiality, souls and salvation. There the differing appraisals of sight and its lesser sibling, touch, track their perceived mediations between the world and the soul. The Old English Boethius, Wærferth's Dialogues and a range of Ælfric's writings illustrate understandings of these senses’ mediation between the material and the immaterial, the corporeal and the incorporeal. The meaning of Wulfstan's legislation on friðlice steora must thus be sought in a crossing of archives of appraisals – the legal valuation of body parts and the patristic understanding of senses as channels between the flesh and the spirit.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
手与眼,视觉与触觉:评价盎格鲁-撒克逊英格兰的感官
盎格鲁-撒克逊人理解感官的知识档案从本土到教父的都有。对感官的日常理解将它们视为相应身体器官的功能,Æthelberht和Alfred的伤害关税说明了这一点。古英语学术散文将从视觉到触觉的感觉按一定顺序分类,说明了对身体,物质性,灵魂和救赎的一系列理解。在那里,人们对视觉和触觉的不同评价,体现了他们对世界和灵魂之间的感知。古英语波伊提乌,Wærferth的《对话录》以及Ælfric的一系列著作都阐释了对这些感官的理解物质与非物质,肉体与非肉体之间的中介。因此,必须在鉴定档案的交叉中寻找沃尔夫斯坦关于frifriice steora的立法的意义- -对身体部位的法律估价和教父对感官作为肉体和精神之间渠道的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Radegund and Amalfrid in The Wife’s Lament Se ðe oðran naman wæs geciged: the Naming of Bishops and Clerics in Late Anglo-Saxon England Newly Discovered Pieces of an Old English Glossed Psalter: The Alkmaar Fragments of the N-Psalter Scholars Come for the Archbishop: the Afterlife of Archbishop Wulfstan of York, 1023–2023 Innovation and Experimentation in Late Seventh-Century Law: the Case of Theodore, Hlothhere, Wihtræd and Ine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1