Personal Factors in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: Prospective Evidence

S. Grotkamp, W. Cibis, E. Nüchtern, G. Mittelstaedt, W. Seger
{"title":"Personal Factors in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: Prospective Evidence","authors":"S. Grotkamp, W. Cibis, E. Nüchtern, G. Mittelstaedt, W. Seger","doi":"10.1017/JRC.2012.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goal of this study was to propose a systematic classification of relevant personal factors for describing the background of an individual’s life and way of living. The German Society of Social Medicine and Prevention constituted an ICF working group consisting of members from Medical Advisory Boards of Statutory Health Insurances (n = 6) and other institutions (n = 12) in 2009. A two-tier consensus building approach was utilised to construct and document the personal factors, with an initial team of experts compiling the personal factors and a second group of experts, who had not participated in developing the initial proposal, validating the process. The consensus process resulted in personal factors classified into 72 categories and arranged in six chapters as follows: general factors normally unchangeable (chapter 1); a person’s inherent physical and mental constitution (chapters 2 and 3); more modifiable factors, such as attitudes, basic skills and behaviour patterns (chapter 4); life situation and socioeconomic/sociocultural factors (chapter 5); and other health factors e.g., prior interventions (chapter 6). We believe the personal factors from this effort to be a good basis for a wider global dialogue on their operationalisation.","PeriodicalId":43415,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Rehabilitation Counselling","volume":"18 1","pages":"1-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/JRC.2012.4","citationCount":"54","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Rehabilitation Counselling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/JRC.2012.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 54

Abstract

The goal of this study was to propose a systematic classification of relevant personal factors for describing the background of an individual’s life and way of living. The German Society of Social Medicine and Prevention constituted an ICF working group consisting of members from Medical Advisory Boards of Statutory Health Insurances (n = 6) and other institutions (n = 12) in 2009. A two-tier consensus building approach was utilised to construct and document the personal factors, with an initial team of experts compiling the personal factors and a second group of experts, who had not participated in developing the initial proposal, validating the process. The consensus process resulted in personal factors classified into 72 categories and arranged in six chapters as follows: general factors normally unchangeable (chapter 1); a person’s inherent physical and mental constitution (chapters 2 and 3); more modifiable factors, such as attitudes, basic skills and behaviour patterns (chapter 4); life situation and socioeconomic/sociocultural factors (chapter 5); and other health factors e.g., prior interventions (chapter 6). We believe the personal factors from this effort to be a good basis for a wider global dialogue on their operationalisation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国际功能、残疾和健康分类中的个人因素:前瞻性证据
这项研究的目的是提出一个系统的分类相关的个人因素,以描述一个人的生活背景和生活方式。2009年,德国社会医学和预防学会成立了一个由法定健康保险医疗咨询委员会(n = 6)和其他机构(n = 12)成员组成的国际健康保险论坛工作组。采用了两层协商一致意见的办法来编制和记录个人因素,由最初的专家小组汇编个人因素,第二组没有参与拟订最初提案的专家小组核查这一过程。在协商一致的过程中,将个人因素分为72类,并分成六章如下:一般因素通常是不可改变的(第1章);一个人固有的身体和精神素质(第二章和第三章);更多可改变的因素,如态度、基本技能和行为模式(第4章);生活状况和社会经济/社会文化因素(第5章);和其他健康因素,例如先前的干预措施(第6章)。我们认为,这一努力中的个人因素可以成为就其运作进行更广泛的全球对话的良好基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Racial, ethnic differences in complementary and integrative health use among adults with mental illness: Results from the 2017 National Health Interview Survey A systematic review of systematic reviews of secondary health conditions, health promotion, and employment of people with intellectual disabilities A landscape of disadvantage: The impact of disability on earning and learning in Australia Musculoskeletal system disorders and kinesiophobia in type 2 diabetes: A case–control study Work-Related Communication Barriers for Individuals with Autism: A Pilot Qualitative Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1