Cohesion as a principle for perceiving objecthood: Does it apply to animate agents?

IF 0.8 Q3 Psychology Swiss Journal of Psychology Pub Date : 2015-09-24 DOI:10.1024/1421-0185/A000164
Trix Cacchione, F. Amici
{"title":"Cohesion as a principle for perceiving objecthood: Does it apply to animate agents?","authors":"Trix Cacchione, F. Amici","doi":"10.1024/1421-0185/A000164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Previous research found that cohesion manipulations (e.g., splitting an object into two parts) may have deleterious effects on infants’ object representation. The present study investigated whether the cohesion principle is relevant only when assessing the continuity of inanimate objects, or whether it is equally fundamental for the perception and representation of animate agents. In two experiments, we assessed 8-month-old infants’ tracking behavior in events in which an agent (an animated snail) was either split in half, fused together, or simply changed its shape. Infants managed to individuate fused snails and snails that had changed their shape, but failed to track split snails, even in a perception-based paradigm. This suggests that the effects of cohesion manipulation apply to animate agents as well as inanimate objects. Moreover, these results suggest that infants’ inability to track split snails is not a consequence of a violation of core principles, but rather a consequence of the incr...","PeriodicalId":46193,"journal":{"name":"Swiss Journal of Psychology","volume":"74 1","pages":"217-228"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swiss Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/A000164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract. Previous research found that cohesion manipulations (e.g., splitting an object into two parts) may have deleterious effects on infants’ object representation. The present study investigated whether the cohesion principle is relevant only when assessing the continuity of inanimate objects, or whether it is equally fundamental for the perception and representation of animate agents. In two experiments, we assessed 8-month-old infants’ tracking behavior in events in which an agent (an animated snail) was either split in half, fused together, or simply changed its shape. Infants managed to individuate fused snails and snails that had changed their shape, but failed to track split snails, even in a perception-based paradigm. This suggests that the effects of cohesion manipulation apply to animate agents as well as inanimate objects. Moreover, these results suggest that infants’ inability to track split snails is not a consequence of a violation of core principles, but rather a consequence of the incr...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内聚作为感知客体的原则:它是否适用于有生命的主体?
摘要先前的研究发现,衔接操作(例如,将一个物体分成两个部分)可能对婴儿的物体表征产生有害影响。本研究调查了内聚原则是否仅在评估无生命物体的连续性时相关,或者它是否对有生命的主体的感知和表征同样重要。在两个实验中,我们评估了8个月大的婴儿在代理人(一只动画蜗牛)被分成两半、融合在一起或只是改变形状的事件中的跟踪行为。婴儿能够区分融合蜗牛和改变形状的蜗牛,但无法追踪分裂蜗牛,即使在基于感知的范式中也是如此。这表明内聚操纵的效果既适用于无生命的物体,也适用于有生命的代理。此外,这些结果表明,婴儿无法追踪劈开的蜗牛并不是违反核心原则的结果,而是由于他们的行为方式不同而导致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Swiss Journal of Psychology
Swiss Journal of Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: General, Clinical, Social, Organizational, Developmental, Personality, and Biological Psychology.
期刊最新文献
Cross-Cultural and Environmental Influences on Facial Emotional Discrimination Sensitivity in 9-Year-Old Children from Swiss and Vietnamese Schools The Psychometric Properties of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Cognitive Reserve Mitigates Decline in Executive Functioning Following Hepatobiliary Diseases Modeling Value-Based Decision-Making Policies Using Genetic Programming Goals Do Not Buy Well-Being, but They Help
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1