Essential differences: constructing frames of reference in spontaneous explanations of differences between the British and the Irish

P. Hegarty
{"title":"Essential differences: constructing frames of reference in spontaneous explanations of differences between the British and the Irish","authors":"P. Hegarty","doi":"10.1080/03033910.2012.754326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Past research has found that explanations of group differences focus attention on lower status and less prototypical social groups, whilst positioning higher status and more prototypical groups as the norm for comparison. The present experiment examined attention in explanations of national group differences. Two hundred and thirty-nine Irish and British students read vignettes that attributed either relatively more overconsumption of alcohol, or of fatty foods, to either Irish or British people, and wrote explanations of these group differences in their own words. As predicted, the explanations focused more on the group described as over-consumers. Participants did not explain the national out-group more than the national in-group and did not explain the Irish or the British more. Rather, explanations focused particularly on the Irish only when they were described as over-consumers of alcohol. These findings show flexibility in the setting of norms for comparison, and an influence of essentialist stereot...","PeriodicalId":91174,"journal":{"name":"The Irish journal of psychology","volume":"34 1","pages":"35-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/03033910.2012.754326","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Irish journal of psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03033910.2012.754326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Past research has found that explanations of group differences focus attention on lower status and less prototypical social groups, whilst positioning higher status and more prototypical groups as the norm for comparison. The present experiment examined attention in explanations of national group differences. Two hundred and thirty-nine Irish and British students read vignettes that attributed either relatively more overconsumption of alcohol, or of fatty foods, to either Irish or British people, and wrote explanations of these group differences in their own words. As predicted, the explanations focused more on the group described as over-consumers. Participants did not explain the national out-group more than the national in-group and did not explain the Irish or the British more. Rather, explanations focused particularly on the Irish only when they were described as over-consumers of alcohol. These findings show flexibility in the setting of norms for comparison, and an influence of essentialist stereot...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本质差异:构建英国人与爱尔兰人差异自发解释的参考框架
过去的研究发现,对群体差异的解释将注意力集中在地位较低和原型较少的社会群体上,而将地位较高和原型较多的群体定位为比较的规范。本实验考察了在解释民族群体差异时的注意。239名爱尔兰和英国学生阅读了一篇小短文,其中将爱尔兰人和英国人相对较多的过度饮酒或高脂肪食物归咎于他们,并用他们自己的话来解释这些群体差异。正如预测的那样,这些解释更多地集中在被称为过度消费者的群体上。参与者对国家外群体的解释并不比对国家内群体的解释多,也没有对爱尔兰人或英国人的解释多。相反,只有当爱尔兰人被描述为过度饮酒者时,解释才会特别关注他们。这些发现显示了比较规范设置的灵活性,以及本质主义刻板印象的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prospective Evaluation of Hearing Status in Neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia. Service users’ experiences of life supported by an Irish mental health service still battling with implementing recovery-orientated principles Teenage parenthood and child externalising and internalising problems: evidence from the ‘Growing Up in Ireland’ study Predictive role of risk and protective factors before and after suicide intervention therapy Elite athlete receptivity to sport psychology consulting in Ireland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1