The legal professions’ new handbooks: narratives, standards and values

IF 1.4 Q1 LAW Legal Ethics Pub Date : 2016-07-02 DOI:10.1080/1460728x.2016.1209811
A. Boon
{"title":"The legal professions’ new handbooks: narratives, standards and values","authors":"A. Boon","doi":"10.1080/1460728x.2016.1209811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article analyses the regulatory handbooks produced by the new regulators for solicitors and barristers, the main legal professions in England and Wales, following the Legal Services Act 2007. It focuses on the new codes of conduct and the 10 high-level regulatory standards that are a feature of each handbook. The article examines the ways in which key interests have been dealt with in the handbooks from the perspective of the historical narratives of the legal professions and their publications, including their previous codes of conduct. It is found that the barristers’ and solicitors’ codes project different ethical orientations towards the supposedly universal ‘standard conception of the lawyer’s role’ based on the principles of neutrality and partisanship. The origins, meaning and significance of the high-level standards are considered. They are found not to reflect the content of the codes of conduct or to communicate cherished elements of the professions’ historical narratives. It is argued that this is problematic in terms of the professional functions of regulation, education and communication.","PeriodicalId":42194,"journal":{"name":"Legal Ethics","volume":"19 1","pages":"207 - 233"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1460728x.2016.1209811","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1460728x.2016.1209811","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article analyses the regulatory handbooks produced by the new regulators for solicitors and barristers, the main legal professions in England and Wales, following the Legal Services Act 2007. It focuses on the new codes of conduct and the 10 high-level regulatory standards that are a feature of each handbook. The article examines the ways in which key interests have been dealt with in the handbooks from the perspective of the historical narratives of the legal professions and their publications, including their previous codes of conduct. It is found that the barristers’ and solicitors’ codes project different ethical orientations towards the supposedly universal ‘standard conception of the lawyer’s role’ based on the principles of neutrality and partisanship. The origins, meaning and significance of the high-level standards are considered. They are found not to reflect the content of the codes of conduct or to communicate cherished elements of the professions’ historical narratives. It is argued that this is problematic in terms of the professional functions of regulation, education and communication.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法律职业的新手册:叙述、标准和价值观
摘要:本文分析了2007年《法律服务法》颁布后,英格兰和威尔士的主要法律职业——律师和大律师——新监管机构制定的监管手册。它侧重于新的行为准则和10个高级监管标准,这是每个手册的一个特点。本文从法律专业及其出版物的历史叙述,包括其以前的行为守则的角度,审查了手册中处理关键利益的方式。研究发现,大律师和初级律师的行为准则对基于中立和党派原则的所谓普遍的“律师角色的标准概念”表现出不同的道德取向。讨论了高级标准的起源、含义和意义。人们发现它们没有反映行为准则的内容,也没有传达这些职业的历史叙述中所珍视的元素。有人认为,这在监管、教育和沟通的专业功能方面存在问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊最新文献
Between Continuity and Change in the Italian Legal Profession – Boutique Law Firms as the Last Bastion of Professionalism Liberal egalitarianism and critical legal studies: articles of conciliation Consequentialism and problem of role morality in legal ethics Should judges be temperate in their speech? Loyalty to client, conviction, or constitution? The moral responsibility of public professionals under illiberal state pressures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1