Abstract 3793: Wake-up Strokes Similar to Known-Onset Morning Strokes in Severity and Outcomes

IF 8.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Stroke Pub Date : 2012-02-01 DOI:10.1161/str.43.suppl_1.a3793
M. Denny, K. Albright, A. Boehme, S. Martin-Schild
{"title":"Abstract 3793: Wake-up Strokes Similar to Known-Onset Morning Strokes in Severity and Outcomes","authors":"M. Denny, K. Albright, A. Boehme, S. Martin-Schild","doi":"10.1161/str.43.suppl_1.a3793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Background:\n Stroke symptoms first noticed upon waking (wake-up strokes) account for 15-30% of all acute ischemic strokes. Whether or not the onset of ischemic stroke wakes people from sleep is not known. We sought to compare patient demographics, stroke characteristics and outcomes among people with wake-up strokes to those with known-onset morning strokes.\n \n \n Methods:\n Using retrospective chart review, we identified patients with wake-up strokes (WUS). WUS was defined as asleep for >3 hours and symptoms noted on wakening from 01:00-11:00. We then identified patients with known-onset morning stroke, defined as symptoms noted when patient already awake, during same time interval. We compared WUS to known-onset morning strokes with respect to patient demographics, stroke severity, etiology and outcomes.\n \n \n Results:\n 112 patients with documented time of 01:00-11:00 when symptoms were first noted were included in the analysis; 33 (29.5%) wake-up strokes and 79 (70.5%) known-onset morning strokes. Patients with WUS were significantly more likely to be female (p=0.009). WUS patients demonstrated a trend toward lower IV tPA treatment rate (p=0.079), higher atherosclerotic burden with greater proportion having carotid artery stenosis (p=0.109), and large vessel mechanism (40.6% vs. 24%). A higher proportion of cortical involvement was also observed among wake-up strokes (p=0.07). Wake-up stroke and known-onset morning strokes were similar with respect to stroke severity (as measured by NIHSS score) at presentation, 24 hours and discharge. WUS was not an independent significant predictor of favorable functional status (mRS 0-2, p=0.371), good disposition (home or inpatient rehab, p=0.909) or mortality (p=0.303). Discussion: While wake-up strokes were similar to known-onset strokes that occurred in the same time interval in stroke severity, functional outcomes, disposition and mortality, WUS patients tended to be older, to be female, and to have large vessel disease. A larger sample size is needed to discern whether large artery atherosclerosis is more likely to cause ischemic stroke while a patient in sleeping and if IV tPA alters the natural history of wake-up strokes.\n \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":21989,"journal":{"name":"Stroke","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2012-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/str.43.suppl_1.a3793","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stroke symptoms first noticed upon waking (wake-up strokes) account for 15-30% of all acute ischemic strokes. Whether or not the onset of ischemic stroke wakes people from sleep is not known. We sought to compare patient demographics, stroke characteristics and outcomes among people with wake-up strokes to those with known-onset morning strokes. Methods: Using retrospective chart review, we identified patients with wake-up strokes (WUS). WUS was defined as asleep for >3 hours and symptoms noted on wakening from 01:00-11:00. We then identified patients with known-onset morning stroke, defined as symptoms noted when patient already awake, during same time interval. We compared WUS to known-onset morning strokes with respect to patient demographics, stroke severity, etiology and outcomes. Results: 112 patients with documented time of 01:00-11:00 when symptoms were first noted were included in the analysis; 33 (29.5%) wake-up strokes and 79 (70.5%) known-onset morning strokes. Patients with WUS were significantly more likely to be female (p=0.009). WUS patients demonstrated a trend toward lower IV tPA treatment rate (p=0.079), higher atherosclerotic burden with greater proportion having carotid artery stenosis (p=0.109), and large vessel mechanism (40.6% vs. 24%). A higher proportion of cortical involvement was also observed among wake-up strokes (p=0.07). Wake-up stroke and known-onset morning strokes were similar with respect to stroke severity (as measured by NIHSS score) at presentation, 24 hours and discharge. WUS was not an independent significant predictor of favorable functional status (mRS 0-2, p=0.371), good disposition (home or inpatient rehab, p=0.909) or mortality (p=0.303). Discussion: While wake-up strokes were similar to known-onset strokes that occurred in the same time interval in stroke severity, functional outcomes, disposition and mortality, WUS patients tended to be older, to be female, and to have large vessel disease. A larger sample size is needed to discern whether large artery atherosclerosis is more likely to cause ischemic stroke while a patient in sleeping and if IV tPA alters the natural history of wake-up strokes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
3793:晨起卒中与已知晨起卒中在严重程度和结局上相似
背景:醒后首次发现的中风症状(醒后中风)占所有急性缺血性中风的15-30%。缺血性中风的发作是否会使人从睡眠中醒来尚不清楚。我们试图比较患者的人口统计学特征、卒中特征和晨起卒中患者的预后。方法:采用回顾性图表法,对醒脑卒中(WUS)患者进行分析。WUS的定义是睡眠时间为50 - 30小时,并且在01:00-11:00醒来时出现症状。然后,我们确定了已知起病的晨卒中患者,定义为在同一时间间隔内患者已经清醒时出现的症状。我们比较了WUS和已知发病的晨起卒中患者的人口统计学特征、卒中严重程度、病因和结局。结果:112例首次出现症状的记录时间为01:00-11:00的患者被纳入分析;33例(29.5%)晨起卒中,79例(70.5%)已知晨起卒中。WUS患者以女性为主(p=0.009)。WUS患者静脉tPA治疗率较低(p=0.079),动脉粥样硬化负担较高,颈动脉狭窄比例较高(p=0.109),大血管机制(40.6% vs. 24%)。在醒脑卒中中也观察到较高比例的皮层受累(p=0.07)。在入院、24小时和出院时,起床卒中和已知发病的晨起卒中在卒中严重程度(以NIHSS评分衡量)方面相似。WUS不是良好功能状态(mRS 0-2, p=0.371)、良好性格(在家或住院康复,p=0.909)或死亡率(p=0.303)的独立显著预测因子。讨论:虽然醒脑卒中在卒中严重程度、功能结局、性格和死亡率方面与同一时间间隔发生的已知卒中相似,但WUS患者往往年龄较大,为女性,并且患有大血管疾病。需要更大的样本量来确定大动脉粥样硬化在患者睡眠时是否更容易引起缺血性中风,以及静脉注射tPA是否会改变醒后中风的自然史。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Stroke
Stroke 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
6.00%
发文量
2021
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Stroke is a monthly publication that collates reports of clinical and basic investigation of any aspect of the cerebral circulation and its diseases. The publication covers a wide range of disciplines including anesthesiology, critical care medicine, epidemiology, internal medicine, neurology, neuro-ophthalmology, neuropathology, neuropsychology, neurosurgery, nuclear medicine, nursing, radiology, rehabilitation, speech pathology, vascular physiology, and vascular surgery. The audience of Stroke includes neurologists, basic scientists, cardiologists, vascular surgeons, internists, interventionalists, neurosurgeons, nurses, and physiatrists. Stroke is indexed in Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAB Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts, CINAHL, Current Contents, Embase, MEDLINE, and Science Citation Index Expanded.
期刊最新文献
Targeted Inhibition of mGlu5 Receptors in the Contralesional Hemisphere Improves Functional Recovery After Stroke. Postnatal Azithromycin Is Neuroprotective and Anti-Inflammatory in a Piglet Model of Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy. Microvascular and Macrovascular Cerebral Disease Profiles and Their Association With Cognitive Abilities: A Cross-Sectional Clinical Pathological Study. Antidepressant Intake and Recovery of Dysphagia After Acute Ischemic Stroke. Targeting Brain Networks for Recovery: Multimodal Innovations in Poststroke Therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1