The role of NGO administrative data in understanding the impact of COVID-19 on survivors of domestic abuse

IF 1.7 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Journal of Gender-Based Violence Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1332/239868021x16414052790822
Katie Smith, Sarah Davidge
{"title":"The role of NGO administrative data in understanding the impact of COVID-19 on survivors of domestic abuse","authors":"Katie Smith, Sarah Davidge","doi":"10.1332/239868021x16414052790822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"COVID-19 quickly changed the context of domestic abuse in England. Within weeks of the first COVID-19 related death, the country was in lockdown. A quick response was essential for understanding the needs of survivors. With limited time to establish new data collection mechanisms, the role of administrative data was central in shaping the response by the Women’s Aid Federation of England. This article explores the opportunities and challenges of using administrative data to understand and respond to the impact of COVID-19 on survivors of domestic abuse in England, using analysis by Women’s Aid of administrative data as a case study. The article discusses the challenges, such as the complexity of analysing a longitudinal administrative dataset, and the need for increased skills and capacity within the NGO research environment. We also reflect on ethical considerations in light of the context of frontline workers responding to the pandemic, the opportunities for collaboration with other sector partners and academics and the benefits of being able to undertake reactive analysis to inform policy. The article concludes that our access to administrative data bolstered our ability to respond expediently to the pandemic, and achieve the long-term benefits of the partnerships that we built during this time.Key messagesAdministrative data offered Women’s Aid a timely and ethical approach to understanding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic with minimal impact on survivors or the services that support them.The nature of administrative data creates unique challenges for researchers as well as opportunities for relevant, impactful research.More resources, collaboration and research are needed to understand administrative data sources held by NGOs.","PeriodicalId":42166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gender-Based Violence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gender-Based Violence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/239868021x16414052790822","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

COVID-19 quickly changed the context of domestic abuse in England. Within weeks of the first COVID-19 related death, the country was in lockdown. A quick response was essential for understanding the needs of survivors. With limited time to establish new data collection mechanisms, the role of administrative data was central in shaping the response by the Women’s Aid Federation of England. This article explores the opportunities and challenges of using administrative data to understand and respond to the impact of COVID-19 on survivors of domestic abuse in England, using analysis by Women’s Aid of administrative data as a case study. The article discusses the challenges, such as the complexity of analysing a longitudinal administrative dataset, and the need for increased skills and capacity within the NGO research environment. We also reflect on ethical considerations in light of the context of frontline workers responding to the pandemic, the opportunities for collaboration with other sector partners and academics and the benefits of being able to undertake reactive analysis to inform policy. The article concludes that our access to administrative data bolstered our ability to respond expediently to the pandemic, and achieve the long-term benefits of the partnerships that we built during this time.Key messagesAdministrative data offered Women’s Aid a timely and ethical approach to understanding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic with minimal impact on survivors or the services that support them.The nature of administrative data creates unique challenges for researchers as well as opportunities for relevant, impactful research.More resources, collaboration and research are needed to understand administrative data sources held by NGOs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非政府组织行政数据在了解COVID-19对家庭暴力幸存者的影响方面的作用
COVID-19迅速改变了英国家庭暴力的背景。在首例COVID-19相关死亡病例出现后的几周内,该国就处于封锁状态。快速反应对于了解幸存者的需求至关重要。由于建立新的数据收集机制的时间有限,行政数据在形成英格兰妇女援助联合会的反应方面发挥了核心作用。本文以妇女援助协会对行政数据的分析为例,探讨了利用行政数据来理解和应对COVID-19对英格兰家庭暴力幸存者的影响的机遇和挑战。本文讨论了挑战,例如分析纵向管理数据集的复杂性,以及在非政府组织研究环境中提高技能和能力的需求。我们还根据一线工作人员应对大流行病的情况,考虑道德方面的考虑,考虑与其他部门伙伴和学术界合作的机会,以及能够进行反应性分析以为政策提供信息的好处。文章的结论是,我们对行政数据的获取增强了我们迅速应对大流行的能力,并实现了我们在此期间建立的伙伴关系的长期利益。行政数据为妇女援助会提供了及时和合乎道德的方法,了解COVID-19大流行的影响,同时将对幸存者或支持他们的服务的影响降到最低。行政数据的性质为研究人员带来了独特的挑战,也为相关的、有影响力的研究提供了机会。要了解非政府组织掌握的行政数据来源,需要更多的资源、合作和研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
49
期刊最新文献
‘I’m terrified of becoming a headline’: an exhibition responding to GBV in Ireland ‘I’m terrified of becoming a headline’: an exhibition responding to GBV in Ireland Does a history with sexual assault impact bystander intervention engagement? An analysis of the risk factors for intimate partner sexual violence against women and girls in Mexico Resilience and agency in children living with domestic abuse: an alternative interpretation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1