The Reliability, Impact, and Cost-Effectiveness of Value-Added Teacher Assessment Methods

IF 0.2 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Education Finance Pub Date : 2012-05-05 DOI:10.1353/JEF.2012.0009
Stuart S. Yeh
{"title":"The Reliability, Impact, and Cost-Effectiveness of Value-Added Teacher Assessment Methods","authors":"Stuart S. Yeh","doi":"10.1353/JEF.2012.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article reviews evidence regarding the intertemporal reliability of teacher rankings based on value-added methods. Value-added methods exhibit low reliability, yet are broadly supported by prominent educational researchers and are increasingly being used to evaluate and fire teachers. The article then presents a cost-effectiveness analysis suggesting that the use of value-added methods to identify and fire the bottom 40% of all teachers reduces average student achievement, is extremely expensive, and is not cost-effective. The policy implication of these results is discussed.","PeriodicalId":44075,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education Finance","volume":"37 1","pages":"374 - 399"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/JEF.2012.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

This article reviews evidence regarding the intertemporal reliability of teacher rankings based on value-added methods. Value-added methods exhibit low reliability, yet are broadly supported by prominent educational researchers and are increasingly being used to evaluate and fire teachers. The article then presents a cost-effectiveness analysis suggesting that the use of value-added methods to identify and fire the bottom 40% of all teachers reduces average student achievement, is extremely expensive, and is not cost-effective. The policy implication of these results is discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
增值教师评估方法的可靠性、影响和成本效益
本文回顾了基于增值方法的教师排名跨期可靠性的证据。增值方法的可靠性较低,但得到了著名教育研究者的广泛支持,并越来越多地用于评估和解雇教师。然后,文章提出了一个成本效益分析,表明使用增值方法来识别和解雇最底层的40%的教师会降低学生的平均成绩,这是非常昂贵的,而且不具有成本效益。讨论了这些结果的政策含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Education Finance
Journal of Education Finance EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: For over three decades the Journal of Education Finance has been recognized as one of the leading journals in the field of the financing of public schools. Each issue brings original research and analysis on issues such as educational fiscal reform, judicial intervention in finance, adequacy and equity of public school funding, school/social agency linkages, taxation, factors affecting employment and salaries, and the economics of human capital development.
期刊最新文献
Per Pupil and School Safety Spending: An Empirical Perspective Tennessee Minnesota Mississippi West Virginia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1