ENFORCED DISAPPEARANCE OF PERSONS UNDER INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL LAW: THE CASE “GUERRILHA DO ARAGUAIA” IN BRAZIL

IF 0.1 Lex Humana Pub Date : 2011-01-01 DOI:10.14195/2175-0947_3-2_1
A. Pinto
{"title":"ENFORCED DISAPPEARANCE OF PERSONS UNDER INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL LAW: THE CASE “GUERRILHA DO ARAGUAIA” IN BRAZIL","authors":"A. Pinto","doi":"10.14195/2175-0947_3-2_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The case “Guerrilha do Araguaia” is well known in Brazil in the view of the disappearances of oppositors to the military regime occurred between 1972 and 1974 , in the region known as Araguaia. Despite the efforts made by the families of the victims to seek responsibility and redress, few progress has been done. In 1995, Brazil recognized its responsibilities for the deaths and established a Commission to provide compensation to the families of the victims. The Amnesty Law prevented the State to initiate the criminal proceedings related to the responsibilities of those involved in the disappearances, torture and killings. On December 2010, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights decided that Brazil is responsible for the enforced disappearances in the Araguaia's region and, following its previous jurisprudence, determined that the State initiate adequate investigation and criminal proceedings related to the facts that amount to crimes against the humanity. In the view of the determination of criminal responsibilities on the “Guerrilha do Araguaia”'s case, this article will examine the grounds of criminal liability of the alleged offenders under the international criminal law as well as under the Brazilian domestic law, analysing the limitations that arise from both jurisdictions.","PeriodicalId":40436,"journal":{"name":"Lex Humana","volume":"3 1","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lex Humana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14195/2175-0947_3-2_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The case “Guerrilha do Araguaia” is well known in Brazil in the view of the disappearances of oppositors to the military regime occurred between 1972 and 1974 , in the region known as Araguaia. Despite the efforts made by the families of the victims to seek responsibility and redress, few progress has been done. In 1995, Brazil recognized its responsibilities for the deaths and established a Commission to provide compensation to the families of the victims. The Amnesty Law prevented the State to initiate the criminal proceedings related to the responsibilities of those involved in the disappearances, torture and killings. On December 2010, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights decided that Brazil is responsible for the enforced disappearances in the Araguaia's region and, following its previous jurisprudence, determined that the State initiate adequate investigation and criminal proceedings related to the facts that amount to crimes against the humanity. In the view of the determination of criminal responsibilities on the “Guerrilha do Araguaia”'s case, this article will examine the grounds of criminal liability of the alleged offenders under the international criminal law as well as under the Brazilian domestic law, analysing the limitations that arise from both jurisdictions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国际刑法规定的人员强迫失踪:巴西的“阿拉瓜游击队”案
“阿拉瓜游击队”一案在巴西是众所周知的,因为1972年至1974年期间在阿拉瓜地区发生了反对军事政权的人失踪的事件。尽管受害者家属努力寻求责任和赔偿,但几乎没有取得进展。1995年,巴西承认对死亡负有责任,并设立了一个委员会,向受害者家属提供赔偿。《大赦法》使国家无法对涉及失踪、酷刑和杀戮的人的责任提起刑事诉讼。2010年12月,美洲人权法院决定,巴西应对阿拉瓜亚地区的强迫失踪事件负责,并根据其以往的判例,决定该国对构成危害人类罪的事实启动充分的调查和刑事诉讼。针对“阿拉瓜游击队”一案的刑事责任认定问题,本文将根据国际刑法和巴西国内法审查被指控罪犯的刑事责任依据,并分析这两个司法管辖区所产生的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lex Humana
Lex Humana LAW-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Subordinated by culture: constraints of women in elective politics in Nigeria ÁREAS DE PRESERVAÇÃO PERMANENTE: PECULIARIDADES DO TEMA NO BRASIL, ESTADOS UNIDOS, PORTUGAL E ESPANHA Jurisdição constitucional e direitos humanos: algumas considerações sobre a arguição de descumprimento de preceito fundamental Análise econômica no direito brasileiro: limites e possibilidades AUTONOMÍA PRIVADA Y AUTONOMÍA DE LA VOLUNTAD: ELEMENTOS PARA EL DIÁLOGO ENTRE TOMÁS DE AQUINO Y AMARTYA SEN
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1