Evaluation in discussion sessions of conference presentations: theoretical foundations for a multimodal analysis

Kalbotyra Pub Date : 2016-03-30 DOI:10.15388/KLBT.2014.7676
M. Querol-Julián, I. Fortanet-Gómez
{"title":"Evaluation in discussion sessions of conference presentations: theoretical foundations for a multimodal analysis","authors":"M. Querol-Julián, I. Fortanet-Gómez","doi":"10.15388/KLBT.2014.7676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Discussions sessions have not received much attention within the genre of conference presentations. In this paper, we present the theoretical framework that underlies the approach followed to analyse the multimodal expression of evaluation. Then, an example of the application of the study has been considered necessary to understand it. Corpus linguistics provided the indications to collect the corpus, annotate it and find the appropriate software to digitalise the relevant information for the study. Secondly, genre studies and conversational analysis gave the clues to establish a structure in the linguistic expressions found in the discussion sessions of paper presentations. Thirdly, systemic functional linguistics and pragmatics provided the basis for an evaluative scheme that could be applied to the academic discourse of the corpus, considering its multimodal nature. Fourthly, the tools to observe the non-verbal communication associated with evaluative language were found in multimodal discourse analysis studies. All together, the application of these variables led to an original study of discussion sessions, which deployed interesting results.","PeriodicalId":30274,"journal":{"name":"Kalbotyra","volume":"66 1","pages":"77-98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kalbotyra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/KLBT.2014.7676","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Discussions sessions have not received much attention within the genre of conference presentations. In this paper, we present the theoretical framework that underlies the approach followed to analyse the multimodal expression of evaluation. Then, an example of the application of the study has been considered necessary to understand it. Corpus linguistics provided the indications to collect the corpus, annotate it and find the appropriate software to digitalise the relevant information for the study. Secondly, genre studies and conversational analysis gave the clues to establish a structure in the linguistic expressions found in the discussion sessions of paper presentations. Thirdly, systemic functional linguistics and pragmatics provided the basis for an evaluative scheme that could be applied to the academic discourse of the corpus, considering its multimodal nature. Fourthly, the tools to observe the non-verbal communication associated with evaluative language were found in multimodal discourse analysis studies. All together, the application of these variables led to an original study of discussion sessions, which deployed interesting results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
会议报告讨论环节的评估:多模态分析的理论基础
在会议报告的类型中,讨论会议没有受到太多关注。在本文中,我们提出了理论框架,其基础是分析评价的多模态表达所遵循的方法。然后,一个应用研究的例子被认为是必要的,以了解它。语料库语言学提供了收集语料库、注释语料库并找到合适的软件将相关信息数字化以供研究的指示。其次,体裁研究和会话分析为在论文报告的讨论环节中发现的语言表达提供了建立结构的线索。第三,考虑到语料库的多模态性质,系统功能语言学和语用学为语料库学术语篇的评价方案提供了基础。第四,在多模态语篇分析研究中发现了与评价性语言相关的非言语交际的观察工具。总之,这些变量的应用导致了对讨论会的原始研究,并得出了有趣的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
Metadiscourse in Lithuanian linguistics research articles: A study of interactive and interactional features Poetic and theatrical occasionalisms: Creation of new morphologically complex words by Joseph von Eichendorff, Johann Nepomuk Nestroy, Peter Handke and Arno Schmidt A corpus-based analysis of light verb constructions with MAKE and DO in British English Rytą or ryte? Vakarą or vakare? A corpus analysis of Lithuanian time expressions denoting parts of the day A parallel corpus-based study of the French verb tomber ‘to fall’: Its semantic plurivocity and equivalents in Polish and Lithuanian
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1