Evaluation of methods for predicting axial capacity of jacked-in and driven piles in cohesive soils

IF 1 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Gradevinar Pub Date : 2018-09-01 DOI:10.14256/jce.2175.2017
N. Obradović
{"title":"Evaluation of methods for predicting axial capacity of jacked-in and driven piles in cohesive soils","authors":"N. Obradović","doi":"10.14256/jce.2175.2017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents the evaluation of methods for predicting the ultimate axial bearing capacity of single piles based on the cone penetration test (CPT) results, and the evaluation of static methods based on the effective and total stress analysis. Seventeen jacked-in MEGA piles and eight Franki piles of different lengths are considered. The results show that the Bustamante & Gianeselli (LCPC) method is the most appropriate for the studied geotechnical conditions and pile types.","PeriodicalId":50415,"journal":{"name":"Gradevinar","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gradevinar","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14256/jce.2175.2017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This paper presents the evaluation of methods for predicting the ultimate axial bearing capacity of single piles based on the cone penetration test (CPT) results, and the evaluation of static methods based on the effective and total stress analysis. Seventeen jacked-in MEGA piles and eight Franki piles of different lengths are considered. The results show that the Bustamante & Gianeselli (LCPC) method is the most appropriate for the studied geotechnical conditions and pile types.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
粘性土中插入桩和打入桩轴向承载力预测方法的评价
本文介绍了基于锥贯试验结果的单桩极限轴向承载力预测方法的评价,以及基于有效应力和总应力分析的静力法的评价。考虑了17个不同长度的MEGA桩和8个不同长度的Franki桩。结果表明,Bustamante & Gianeselli (LCPC)方法最适合所研究的岩土条件和桩型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gradevinar
Gradevinar ENGINEERING, CIVIL-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
18.20%
发文量
56
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Quasi-static tests on RC building columns strengthened with CFRP Construction of a new day hospital in Zadar using recycled aggregate concrete Damage assessment of water supply networks due to seismic events using vulnerability functions Centrifugally-cast concrete poles with non-metallic reinforcement Overview of research on fire effects in RC elements and assessment of RC structures after fire
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1