Dynamic Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets with Cloud Storage

IF 0.9 Q4 BUSINESS Journal of Industry Competition & Trade Pub Date : 2017-04-23 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.2633680
M. Tremblay
{"title":"Dynamic Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets with Cloud Storage","authors":"M. Tremblay","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2633680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Platform providers in two-sided markets compete over time by introducing new generations of their platforms. New generations are often backward compatible through some form of cloud storage so that consumers' content, preferences, apps, software, and games from the previous generation can still be used on the current generation. When platform providers compete over time, consumers that switch platforms are unable to use their previous content. With two-sidedness, the incumbent platform provider is able to use its price to the other side of the market, the price to content providers, to endogenously determine the strength of the consumer carryover utility that its consumers face when considering switching platforms. Thus, two-sidedness with cloud storage results in endogenously determined switching costs. I find that cloud storage is not used to foreclose platform entry but instead is used to soften competition between platform providers. Furthermore, the resulting equilibria comport with anecdotal evidence of attempted entry across several platform industries, such as smartphones, video game consoles, personal computers, eReaders, and online streaming subscriptions.","PeriodicalId":45683,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Industry Competition & Trade","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Industry Competition & Trade","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2633680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Platform providers in two-sided markets compete over time by introducing new generations of their platforms. New generations are often backward compatible through some form of cloud storage so that consumers' content, preferences, apps, software, and games from the previous generation can still be used on the current generation. When platform providers compete over time, consumers that switch platforms are unable to use their previous content. With two-sidedness, the incumbent platform provider is able to use its price to the other side of the market, the price to content providers, to endogenously determine the strength of the consumer carryover utility that its consumers face when considering switching platforms. Thus, two-sidedness with cloud storage results in endogenously determined switching costs. I find that cloud storage is not used to foreclose platform entry but instead is used to soften competition between platform providers. Furthermore, the resulting equilibria comport with anecdotal evidence of attempted entry across several platform industries, such as smartphones, video game consoles, personal computers, eReaders, and online streaming subscriptions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于云存储的双边市场动态平台竞争
随着时间的推移,双边市场的平台提供商通过推出新一代平台来竞争。新一代产品通常通过某种形式的云存储进行向后兼容,这样消费者上一代产品的内容、偏好、应用程序、软件和游戏仍然可以在当前这一代产品上使用。当平台提供商长期竞争时,切换平台的消费者无法使用他们以前的内容。有了双向性,现有的平台提供商能够利用其对市场另一端的价格,即对内容提供商的价格,内生地决定消费者在考虑切换平台时面临的消费者结转效用的强度。因此,云存储的双面性导致了内生决定的转换成本。我发现云存储并不是用来阻止平台进入,而是用来缓和平台提供商之间的竞争。此外,由此产生的平衡与一些传闻证据相一致,这些证据表明,智能手机、视频游戏机、个人电脑、电子阅读器和在线流媒体订阅等多个平台行业都试图进入市场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.30%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade (JICT) publishes research on the microeconomic foundations of industrial strategy, innovation, competition, and trade policy, concentrating on the functioning of markets for goods and services. The journal’s primary aim is to bridge the gaps between economic theory, empirical analysis and economic policy, and to provide a forum for applied theoretical research on policy questions. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade promotes the combination of theories with facts, and encourages the incorporation of facts into model building. focuses on using applied theoretical research to arrive at policy conclusions, and encourages researchers to investigate policy questions. For example, game theoretical models that analyse the sources of and obstacles to innovation, the functioning of markets or strategic interactions are combined with empirical facts; and supporting empirical analysis is provided for models that explain how institutions, consumers and firms interact, how they shape their environment, and how incentives influence behaviour. Papers that analyse institutions and policy measures are expected to make explicit reference to theoretical models, while theoretical work is expected to include the analysis of empirical implications.   The journal serves as a forum for dialogue between economists from academia and (national or international) policy circles. The composition of the Editorial Board, which includes academics as well as leading economists working at governmental and international organizations, facilitates exchanges between academia and economic policy. Officially cited as: J Ind Compet Trade
期刊最新文献
May It Be a Little Bit More of Market Power? On Productivity Growth and Competition The Bilateral USA-Mexico Trade Balances Under Decomposed Export Data Backward Partial Vertical Integration Through Private Placement Estimating Brand Drugs’ Payoff from Pay-for-Delay Deals Embodied and Disembodied Spillovers from FDI: Sectoral Evidence from Ireland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1